Kevin Balditt v. State
Kevin Balditt v. State
Opinion
TH E. HOTTL£ C-OUIU" Of APPGAUS rr - neeves 3"«snc6 t 3 2.00 c^oLOitosA lt) — Za lO —i.—« -_ -n
fe § I SalditT
TK,
VIA IA.S. AAA i
TiME To PtUe
I of Cause No . (W-i5-0M.«3i " Tk.;al CovlkT Wo. 2.
THe c&agt
TWE STArB of T'^as Saij HwTWNiog
p ro >"
Appellant's M°tiom "To gx-rewptuas to
THAT THIS riffJ^ABLE £iMi«T £iCT£nD THC T//i/i£ TO FIl£ MIS SftlCF AnJ in 5».-.PPC2T 0? HIS d£QttcST SHOWS:
I - APPtU-AW is A is kjctt
'1.
H AppEaflM- has wevm wqustBp p6*. ^^ c'v:tc^/0;J. w Mft S. APPeU-AMT WflJ, Bee^ WrfSKeCBSMfc ,M O
crJ U.S. po3T^u mail- Por Oe/-.iAA/iersrri AFFlPAf.- 7.
8. %elM SeeKs * (j.o) ^ ♦d*^ 4* prop^L
ei 11*&4e -\w-e. /\jbrf«rn -(vU
pp THAT dATc
the" foP- ?0B-
- tLeeves S* D«*Tlt rcr
Toes no.
a \anJjt op -pHc of
of
%M TDLjiON*. =! c: -\
£ ? £ O r- h m
1! H X
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.