Kyle Miller v. State
Kyle Miller v. State
Opinion
fcftE T3ESTFXCJ"
-r*—3-rfg X^1 CD
Ccurt C^N To The
f of HlU day■^ causey ftr 4V\e ^llobj'in^ reasons -U pp ^ bud: only sUbsfQiMwfe Rrael Icut^ fi Unoj l^s UsHbn s as
a uWivt*£d d^y^.a^ (XppelW-^Jii teei fe
a
nT4^"( auesVtfcn. m Ccujisel Glfe is At Tv\ cm in A^ec^Vto :1\^ -hn We. -+d caLt a V "to w-Wansivi&k_LiQlTAftie>-sucl^a
supp -+
Mb aTi+* outW'vfer alloctalHrtewak) hue teen at : l 9015, s\ Pro-Se. cu
Cbwse a daloj^ of'QA' leaeV one. i^sar m Vino^Tr^ a has too in
xil-Uxireui ji£r order ani as r 5i)C-W> a-Viwi^
not- c>n
Lupn C
//<;■ i
lr\oar(eei\a **« order A J3 jpaaes, Cain^l o^ec^s -te Tost Ahdr; 4ta. «^\dtenot ^ml Si P^JWvf was was cWTeA -Wiser! pH> \t> c\4e pnor ^g suppress, CCu^al or be, e^T imWialT^CirWeefc defense.Hife rmfe
d4 Xroxu 'Rales of firsfelanal Cmkic^' ^ales c^^Tdevofie-fiW ih Texcs
tiIUu of eyktk^^r o ^pf 6uji\ -U^^ac^u Qrdl ^ta defiripKon Off ftuiddy ■taundl owl G^ C PA ^
She uJas-Wi i^crV-Ac> veoi pp ii OofC; pqe«> 3co- Ho\cS \no\-W ^eqiv/en 4o P^dloM- after lne. uJo^ Kandcvud^fel/pb^jed in
avfcUvri-fe. fcSei
.UJ- Sin
-ftd- ial i
3.. b a£Rfm&l m 4ta jKcA- 4Ual- ov wttaess uj(Xs rcA- ^'ouM mar mode -to i W £ 4W lkrm and AppelW-fiViTs Known wdwesb a^-Wanscribd <&-h> Wincj Wicuin Oh ft^rAerk Record and again on poqe feaPu o V\eoMn\<\om^G 4o wtihe MdcHW O&*jfe ouJaTlalole, \nofcks "CLe. Ctacess m a-^ctanen-U tuay Owi ana. an -error error Co^ Co^ sUxpirl PcpdlarVfe cloanorrtie f^-kdKn^ 4W-a"DCre<4 Is ll recowi cf iv\fiyMA
dHridl/ fm juUU Cdxld Counsel -k^rN OrA AW
1W and l4 £>p4
, Afar,., Ill
t/tSBn-lCtex. IW3, pdrrefifi.
i ayidksu.€>cl QCOUi+clI fir
• MyComm.Exp.02-22-2019 RE1"URN j M>P7 4th CourC of Appeals Criminal Justice Center DoSorosa n Antonio, Texas 78205
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.