Maurice Samuel Arrington v. State
Maurice Samuel Arrington v. State
Opinion
/#s^
B ^ t "TVHIPO XpLS^riCT CCU^T Of f\?fEtfVL5 *T Ajsiim TE.A4S
K^uRic£ 3AMuei_ A^iM&ToKi •I ;^£(>e^cA*"\4 April 17, 2015 ^ r ^RECQVEa^- , tu£ 5t^t€ of "T&tos I mij2m
*u-
i...7M.QICI19.*-. COuBl, Of ^»EU CQUNTV TtjUflS v
\ Motion po* E/j&msioa/ of time to tiie...A^ju^rS #*0 4£ ihOTloh) F0? HEHEflM/Ofcj !>/ -R£SfOMS£ To 0&$?$. • v. < ]X)SCXS^0AJ.,; •'! \ \ fSk:Mj&:r^oAiiD^eu. Justices o^the cowr aF f*fr^#^: \ : •••;&• , ' 4,-.. i>: -.'. .|... itones hoiAj MAOZj.cz >S^^£4^WIa»CTok/, .Afp<\\«oh \
1lTh;^M 4^^ v "^° :^"»ff!«r^. -vppf!)*<»* ow9*A«* SV>«u> -$-*»* "•••••- ' •-.*«jr* ..f""._ A ' '•. - , ." •'. i ', •' •k> 0^€ d^ccVc CopiCS O^ (Hvj <X(>pc\\cvV<L po-s*----****--..
•x... . .'. 1Z" |~- TK pr^Son PW\iW 3- onn -\oc<xlccV <xV W»V w 4~ 4loOc -*Iouj^ {W c t»e«>t and c)ietcnc\(^\ v>c^ A^i^~-~. to Ylt»-ac«5S Wa Icioo - l.brcvru , _L ^
Ul^^ p<:WVf00er pra^s ^S Coo,rV y^V ^V r^&^0<^n^-^ •--..-.;MmOA/ FO* 1?>EW£tfi?XM6 i/i ^;s Case dumber 1 ,. :.,63* J3^oodfc>w,-cK 4b ^le»j 20, ^oir ! ^»
"T^ta* Xiepoc1* ...me/i K.of/ , -•
T0C3 XD*£ i*33Nr*( *OS>novr o<o Te*e6y nn$%$ ; C«<\\CUcvVt of 5e<olce
~i©\>out a*uA Ce»fe^o'*r\cy -5ecor»e\. (t\«v\o^ So/ -e*Ve^y»oo.......... :©«- k/*u U P;U -por "RtKfcflftXNG, WS \»CXA Cofux^d-ecA :VyJv y.5. /Aa.'l, ^aSVt^y {Kcpoviel, ?^«Sv C^ V> "V*v< • 0\4^o<<Necx f©<- -W>€ 5V<xVe. o>r. 6<ab \>» O^om, oA ./
;-rcxcvS m^ Ov^ Vvn\S I3VV^ dQ^ o*^ fite-^'V^1^ /0^*
! T /44/sxcl SfioiueL ^in^to*/ , Toes •« I I&334SM, ioC'Vi^v pr^Sc/)^ i^ccvCeroid '^ W-t ! '?W?5<M I tW O* fW Tfc/IA^ "0^pf?Tm^WT Of C«X(inXWflL 1.:3iijC£ »tf iSf^Torr^ Courly JettS O^^J eyr*JL \ SUMrnenVy act \<^( aocJ Co<rti\- •otfeu^c/ an f-h.'5 j/ft*. /3^ <=Jq^ C>f Apr.) <?o>r.;.
T1?C5^ lf33*-\rK] j^ii-iL^aoLs;
_fflr> feffeaJil^^ iA^Sq X tjo^Vg-
•X/
H- |u -f ^j \**t \ i.i', .'!•; i n iu H At i'. > • i- i.7 ?S:'i 1254747 l-ll«»HlJJ»*II'II'l'l»»
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.