La Quint Sullivan v. State
La Quint Sullivan v. State
Opinion
Cause NO. _i /
THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. IN THE DISTRICT COURT JP JUDICIAL DISTRICT BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM NEGOTIATED PLEA TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Come now j
1. There was a trial in this cause C )yes C )no o -H and the trial was a 1 —I
( ) jury trial ( ) non-jury trial 2. The trial commenced on the day of , °ntoe day of _, ana°ended: J. mere was a plea bargain agreement )no 4. The plea bargain agreement was followed by the Court ( )no 5. Defendant was sentenced on the /V davof r.;t sentence commenced on the on tEi-~ 11 W~ .and 6. A motion for New Trial was filed i )no
(A) the appeal is for ajurisdictional defect (explanation attached hereto); _ (B) the substance ofthe appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial (motion and ruling attached hereto); _ (C) permission to appeal ( ) lias-been granted by trial court ( ) has been denied by trial court Respectfully submitted,
"Defendant STATE OF TEXAS' vs
SULLIVAN, UQ 545777 09/30/1975
WOOD I,,, BERTRAM OLIVER 310SSAINTM/- 7 (210)482-9663 r
J se,eo,ed *o The Case Court 485467 Offense CC2 2015CR7177 D187 -2 07 2015CR2233 D187
.i-"1
Bi -i
■■■: ^ 37232
:12pm
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.