La Quint Sullivan v. State
La Quint Sullivan v. State
La Quint Sullivan v. State
Opinion
/M T sr/m: of Btxtx C ?
<>2>
MOTION TO ~o 5
CO ■.-.'- « ;.•'
ASIDE INOIC W-f- m He /a/ if Mi's t Court fit
IN addihctv A vy &t-i,r t Sy /an
/■ 71*/ //-
/fat perse* fa w fit-
J. • /t m 32A.
ART, it 4. Ol. T*/+t *S
y fc aefa j{<//J< On, fails
This arhe'fe "«S
(I) 100 dHf/S // Mt ^
T a
ar lk& fn+ry , IE.
Mf.it.
fit s. *
y>^
Hi , j
, w h/l -/it/- Ji/t. 0?j Mf **/ /(rfcU I*- 60/... 4^ S f r*f* to SB
-H) ^
t ok hi ' —~r . $4,6 is Urth f
fk<L _ ^ O C
o n C3, Q
f—
so G vn Q! m
Q
"So
re*
c CO *
rl ■=!■
■ ■ o -■■ .VXJ
r - - □ j p - .., o i : : VI
■' o ■.-■
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.