Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Curbed.com, LLC and Sarah Firshein v. Dr. Richard Malouf and Leanne Malouf

Curbed.com, LLC and Sarah Firshein v. Dr. Richard Malouf and Leanne Malouf
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 29, 2015

Curbed.com, LLC and Sarah Firshein v. Dr. Richard Malouf and Leanne Malouf

Opinion

Vacate and Remand and Opinion Filed April 29, 2015

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01636-CV CURBED.COM, LLC AND SARAH FIRSHEIN, Appellants V. DR. RICHARD MALOUF AND LEANNE MALOUF, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-06268-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Fillmore, Stoddart, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, vacate the trial court’s order, and remand this case to the trial court with instructions to enter judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. We grant the motion to the extent that we set aside the trial court’s order without reference to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment consistent with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

131636F.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT CURBED.COM, LLC AND SARAH On Appeal from the County Court at Law FIRSHEIN, Appellants No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-06268-C.

No. 05-13-01636-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill.

Justices Fillmore and Stoddart participating.

DR. RICHARD MALOUF AND LEANNE MALOUF, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial court’s November 4, 2013 Order Denying Defendants Curbed.com, LLC and Sarah Firshein’s Anti- SLAPP Motion to Dismiss under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 27.001 et seq. without regard to the merits and REMAND the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered April 29, 2015.

–2–

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.