Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Nathaniel Frazier, Jr. AKA Nathaniel J. Frazier v. State

Nathaniel Frazier, Jr. AKA Nathaniel J. Frazier v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 24, 2015

Nathaniel Frazier, Jr. AKA Nathaniel J. Frazier v. State

Opinion

June 24, 2015 APPEAL NO: 03-14-00655-CR IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

NATHANIEL FRAZIER, APPELLANT PRO SE• VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

APPEAL OF CAUSE NUMBER D-13-0958-SA FROM THE 391ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF TOMGREEN COUNTY

RECEIVED FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'!

PRO SE BRIEF OR RESPONSE TO ANDER'S BRIEF M 2 4 2015 TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS: THIRD COURT OF ArPEA'S

Comes Now NATHANIEL FRAZIER/"Appellant" pro se/ and moves the Court to extend the deadline for filing his brief (or response) by 90 days.

In support/ Appellant would show the following:

I.

On iluly 15/ 2014/ the Iiry found Appellant guilty of Assault/Family Violence Impedinq Breath/Circulation. The Judge assessed punishment at (18) years imprisonment in the Texas Depactmsnt of Criminal Justice.

II.

On May 10/ 2015/ Appellant received notice by Certified mail/ signature requested by 3bhn B ConnalLy mail room supervisor/ of appeal attorney's filed Anders brief and notice that Appellant had a riqht to file a pro se brief or response to the Anders brief.

iJ?

0nf>PZjUA<f2B15-the Appellant record was first made available to Appellant. The deadline for filing Appellant's br:ief or response isx_.7jujj/ 2015.

IV.

This is Appellant's first request for extention. Appellant is unable to meet the deadline for the following reasons: I a.) limited acceo^ to the law few hours a day/ b.) layman to the law thereby slowing down my research, c.) innerent delay's with the prison law library's next-day shepardizing and intra-loan s/stem/ d.) limited legal resources., and e.) outdated (1) books that require additional time to receive material/ to research/ prepare/ and deliver documents to the Court].

V. For the.reasons stated above/ Appellant respectfully request an additional 90 days to complete the pro se brief or response in support of Appellant's appeal.

VI.

Appellant prays that the Court grant this motion and extend the time to file Appellant's pro se brief or response by &0 days/ extending the deadline to.

Respectfully Submitted/ NATHANIEL.FRAZIER fOmhiMm.fAa^^ Appellant/ Pro se CONNALLY UNIT TDC#1942796 899 FM 632 KENEDY/ TEXAS 78119

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

*fi—of_ik.0_V_, This to certify that on thej.2 of_jJiCi_Srl/ 2015, a true and correct cop/ of the above and foregoing document was served on the THIRD COURT OF APPEALS, POST OFFICE BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711, by Uni:ed States Postal Service (Certified) Mail.

UNSWORN DECLARATION

I NATHANIEL FRAZIER, BEING PRESENTLY INCARCERATED IN 2E)HN B CONNALLY UNIT IN CARNES COUNTY, TEXAS/ declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. "Executed on theJ£- day of-J^-l^-, 2015. A£ Under both Federal Law (28 U.S-C. Section 1746) and State Law ( U.T.C.A. Civil Practices and Remedies Code, Section 132.001-132.003)/ offenders incarcerated in Texas may use an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury in place of a written declaration, verification / certification oath or affidavit sworn before a Notary Public.

CC: FILE DISTRICT ATTORNEY

(2) •si Q) •si

l\) in 4*. -j •si a fc-» in •si • -C

a Tk-S'-R

P^=> a- o •5^ ^ 18, «= a c

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.