Weylin Alford v. State
Weylin Alford v. State
Opinion
.,\nn\lfo VO b&M #• tj^lE Cout2.T or uljmikuvv ftppeilee
<^z—H- <w ^ ^
ux&V ^ESoltow __
-TL »©
to *!•
... / vjv \\ y I (M-2__L
&l\]fl£^^ J^i^W^4K10«^W
v*fc^E$jb^^
^)____i\Bj^El^ ^\&_^
to
*'' _iil__k_^ EEte,fed i_tine Sfrtes facufjVl __ WfeaihWW^ J^___ So)^
^Wid__m^ 1 ^ fe&DuS- ;e_}_^_±>_ \gM ^oidt&tl^vi 2^aV\o ^b^frfts________.Could __t___4_____fiffAL fte^Ctg»r. App.1^^)jKflcWU•\T>S.iO^diA--V vr-vs (^mM&& fags.i^m^Ma__k_&__ Mli$___ir^^ UJCUCl 3_H!___Vfe(±^
1$ \fe _____ _\g_ |SB_Mg_ _i_ S_l^__(____£K_\SuOPJ-Vie fiafr _S&^ jte___%) mV^iCi^r
^ Ssft %_saM\bK) as$axyifeV4\foaA £_^_M M*fa dra-ico uMdudA^_i~ o
$&s_^_^tAA feyaVi jv»£ ijSSism h^MmkM^^ ______j_fe^^ Qe£R___) CcMO^_ 4 taxfltojs UH£ ioeH Lat)__J j&g£ i_M u> sWak M_iLk ted^kxklfcki bfMSdP&_ig/r3glffeg teifg^ ETdifoA^u J/w _____j^E_^y kjyd^-fedfet qpe; ity Ck\MM& _j_y____j ^_____^___Mj_yedi^_fc p^^to^pfOSE^j/^^yjipc fttj Ji&ib _Q____mA MDAufK c^^_to______tpeEs4il
_J__UlkJa,^^
_i_S>£__!_^^ r=^pt^>qvini__iJL_ivo vuiwgJi tnciv-ui^;ic^j^j>i>^x;^ijiitt:„ ___ \i _ 0 It. _oi \ P n In
to_t____j_u__aij^^ gfajjA?^ ^Coodusks^lML^fl^t^te ^CCfeTJM"^dh>ld wfeAI(M/ ^»*r -HE /__ _%TJd^E^o^tMLQ!ldefta£it' _____l£&4itte_ Ht. -to: WWihLaaJJMajyUSfaosfitutfos) __g_6m)____bMft6j) s__ \J3 S&lMlflBiPkp-i^^ s mAtkt .. ____„____^„.M_._ _-.__.__^_^^__._Ik^^:Js^
ftSlJ_J___tel£Q^ &
A#^^p-ixgss ^^\^^^JM^i\L^^^_ —- __._: ,__,
h& jjjM frafer hwe oft opwfa.' u__taiM_^ u.eMifciQ^a ^__g|l_____l___3__fl_^_j_^__|__^p_»_^fc_______ *&\U\mRatalIfeMak^^ll .^gWlaite. paifypfyagfciJ Mfe&_ . tjbfwa_ttue ftud Cceted-, eKE_±^._iJfek^__C -^fc&e^ J____V§t___E^ ye^iaj^^ _ 61&1&I ^ftfm&kt- o
oTPiceI ~ ? *_uWTte_ ~":r~3)- _^HuT_; RECEIVED FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS SEP 1 4 2015 MAIL RECEIVED CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.