William Horace Walker v. State
William Horace Walker v. State
William Horace Walker v. State
Opinion
."X. ^cc*.\\ < Ko,oe W\^ 1H .
J ry. y Please. cCctcL+^L.5 J c}c^u
X Oc^cfly ^ vn
cowrv s ]±
\n L{ f" J ' ty\\
m
-|t> td no-h * So SllvMq -jo char at, lr\Tz> a-S> y-er• ^t- fio co cjv^ s p
X- .JjJ«
iTx>fh M \l X ) <k %
bud / bu \Jra o_es nor' V-oh 1, M
in X f- / / ^£ poems Dfp if
}
h>he J
A •fa a.
pfa
jCe*P-jyi l\ t /0&**
j O ^ ?
-fi Livn jocls he
^
f- doni £lhcI in fl ty cka/iaea M&isi "£■ was* n/l. fayh'ty,
.
<j...B/oa/s_ q
a
f t
(r hj/ $oul} cowrie
of -f d?c
Oh \z vo fauj ho
\ X n X-
r
. Mi/ l
M\ICMl_Jy^\^\\\ lepUaJcJ if you do < A /i$3 fcr^ X jll W^ Me faA \lo\A M
-.. f PRIVILEGED OFFENDER M lAlIl NOT INSPECTED BY TEX DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE- CORRECT1, OVAL INSTITUTIONS niVIMON
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.