/2ZS-IS V f~) SIGINAL iH-QQ /raff6^ A ,, + RECEIVED IN : SEP 18 m

FILEDIN- 7/g S/^e J Ttya.% CQURT0F criminalappeals yWA* / SEP 18 2S15 Abel Acosta, Cierk

Pehh'on tor Rwie.u> in Cnu^e /i/o. Q5~H~ OO^ll- IK This is a Petition tor Lbisa'e.iionzryJ ftevieujj f evi tu/mg the Averse. decKion/opinion of tJne. I±xas Court d-f Cncnm'dl Appeals in fhetr affirmation of tht trial Courts qu'ilty vtrdict.

Appellant ujou/J state; after tafci^j Me tria.1 tf&nscr.pts &rd trial Exh)hlts C.dllecti*?i\,; M/3 Monofable Court ^Aou/d Atrerse. snd Re/na^J tAis (\aus&jQfter granting the Certinr,} 6&c£ to 1~Ae g-Xfri Cnmrt or Criminal AppealSj uulfA instructions to" thdf Honorable Court -ha r on and this, wa'tfer hstk fp the Trial Court for full adjudication rtf the facts Consistent \jo\th this •HonoraAU Courts Mandate, naweL ft) &t fye. evidence adduced -at fn'af ma.s Uf&l/j/ insufficient to sustain a Zibnyi eti b'n..

-I - .Appall,a/of tAJQuld Submit that SCtorJinj Jjho fjie p6hrP Report^ Elaine Sai/y 5/af<vi #>*f /W vehicle, /lad V-A^-ee £0 /^ scratch ts~ fft f/U right S<^g;' iajAjcA oaurrfr/ u)/><v? fye appplla^ Lz\\?jec\lyl Collided uuth her, please te-e ;W ref-tr to ^faH'-S fyhlhils S; U and 8.

AC(l0jLd/_aj_Tb_J^^5m^^ jiisxr^/^jiy_is_5AftuJ-p^tf^^ LJ a'0-e_6_a.L/j?y -" c^r)i£d^_a^.J_i>o^.ux^l/ao.s./-^LD./7jiluj,b.ea^ .a±Jr!^;j^_^AiA_wj^ .her 1/^.Aiflg. /)cfnr*j;/->j fn+hp Ra/v-Um Ha^p D<V-<-;noa/-/i/J.

J-o^sJ:dle—OMS-e^.i/4^rL.wL/.M- t-0Lcu_u.(_w2pa.c.Lj-Cf3s£ jLoj?JY3ry_J_Ms,J^Bj/jL)L^ ._ ^/}.fMka.tls_car:. ___ _ fLuLty^m££-)Jy—/-oAkLOj^ Vou'/I notice fkat f//e pht>f6jrdph< prodused _dj>_r?o£_ Supp-orJljfild^i:hw.Djo^-yij^en^f:o-^.fi '£>aJhs—C-o^nl/- hJjLt^cp-&rjM£ni„Elagj.e_r£fc^ ' a-ih.^CQj£^L6.&£)Jkz-Suppj)^ fb^Jb^±&A^^Jz^n.<L£no -2 trial Court; itxat Court d? fnmi/iJ Jaoed/j Zs?r/ Aeorr this HonnrAiy/p Court^iooujP) evide^nre to proi/e 'ujMouf sloA.dn\ju of a dnaAt, Mat rki<. incident did naf QCCUr *uxJJ&Ljn&m*Lj6dLM^ s d/s-Jj-cLd,.

3:&m£ly.J-ll&—CoJltSj-on-,J).oJ^ pldcinri in imminentAanoesj inhere Me State \ JAhrritJJ :had tb fear for t)cr lift.

yJJoirrfoj^AtCEkJji^JL^ ton fen JuMxsLj^jLjiaLjtidiusl^ C^ort-^h^^i^JL^f—t^rj±Q/ZL J~-n %c r-psc dm Aefore tliis ftnnoraA/* Pourf, apae/laif JS-\t* emphasis on line J7; "... /tf/r G*W«rA fried ¥o Ait Vour vehicle with his vehicle... ' Please note. that Me witness AneS not std-h appellant tSe</crJ m?de Content u/ith her ire hide.

BaW On tkt States fjrtness Lo^nl testimony, appellant never made con tact ujirh he' ye-hiJe. fhi/s all fe?Jonp/)/e inference that Tire nfcorde>d h ttie SHte are nullified. Tn f»ct} Hie Sjde\ \Alitr)eSS \A)ho initially fi/pfJ the Complaint (Pullet Report) recanted hoth prior to tri^l TinJ Auring hrid/} tJr]eo_ui\rocg/lv statinj appellant Aid not fJ/lJe uf&k the rthide tke. State \ l/ttneSfeS ujes* -5"