Mireles, Carlos
Mireles, Carlos
Opinion
_@,dw@'d\ - ~ ` ` 03020/000;
EARLus MIRELES ©@URTQF@RMNALAPPEALS T.D.B.J.# 1700307 _ 010 FM 2021 SEP 29 2015 HUNTSVILLE,TX 77349 1 A{@@EA@@S?@,CE@FE< - ABEL AEDSTA (ELERK) ' sEPTEMBER 20, 2015 0F THE cRIMINAL 00uRT 0F APPEALS EERTIFIED MAIL 00.# 005 P-U- BDX 12399 . 2010 1200 0002 1092 9770 BAPITuL STATluw AusTIN,Tx 70711 RE: 'i::REQUESTlNG;COMMUNTCATIQNS'WITH'THE:€LERK:RULE{Q@@,?; DISMISSAE*OF APPICATION WRIT NO; WR-83-460-Ol EX PARTE MIRELES
DEAR cLERK AcusTA, UN SEPTEMBER`UQ, 2015 THE ERIMINAL EUURT UF APPEALB~DISMISSEDf MY SH§MITTED (PRIMA FACIE) APELICATIDN'FUR MRIT UF HABEAS EDRPUB IN THE AEDVE STYLED EAUSE, FUR NDN-EUMPLIANEE MITH T.R.A.P. 73.1 SPEEIFIEALLY, THAT THE SUPPURTINE MEMURANDUM EXEEEDE 2505 PAEES AND THE TRIAL EUURT HAD NUT GRANTED LEAVE TD EXCEED THE PRESERIBED LIMIT. (1). THE DISTRIET ELERK UF BEXAR EUUNTY~(DISTRICT EUURT'S ELERK) AS UBVIDUS, NEVER NUTIFIED MYSELF UF THE NUN`CUNFURMING ERRUR AND DISMISSED THE APPLIEATIUN AND;RETURN`IT'TU ME IN A EFFDRT THAT I MAY CURRECT l f DEFECT ITSELF.¢PHIS LEFT THE TRIAL BDURT UPEN TD'AEEEPT THE APPLIEATIUN\AND THE (EU)'PAEE EXEEED EDNMEMURANDUM, AS_IF‘I HAD MDTJUNED`SUCCESSFULLY FUR LEAVE TU EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED LIMIT. (2). T.R.A.P.ngh (B). DIBCUSSES THE“T§,UUU'MURDB'IF‘EUMPUTER FURM ’ GENERATED AND (EU) PAGES IF NUT,FUR THE‘BRIEF`(MEMURANDUM) ALSU REQUIRINE THATWNUN CUMFDRMINE DDEUMENTS`BE IDENTIFIED BY THE CUURT AND "STATE A DEADLINE" FDR THE PARTY TD RESUBMIT THE DUEUMENT IN A EDNFDRMINE FURMAT. SEE. SUBSEETIDN (K) (3). T.R.A.P. 73-3 DIETATES NDNEUMPLIANCE IN'A`HABEAS'SETTLNG. THE CLERK UF~THE EDUWT DF ERIMINAL APPEALS MAN, UITHUUT EILING AN APPLICATTUN THAT DUES NUT EUMPLY UITH”THIS RULE/“RETURN IT TU THE ELERK UF‘THE E@NVIETINB EUURT, MITH~A NDTATIUN.UF THE DE- FECT,`AND THE ELERK UF THE CUNMIETINE CUURT MItL RETURN THE APPLIEATIUN_TU THE PERSDN MHUM FILED IT. cLERK ADUSTA, Mv 15505 00NCERNS THE LEuELS AT mHIcH THE APPLIEATI0N AND MEMURANDUM mER3"PERMITTED T0 TRKVEL FRDM PUINT'(A) T0 PUINT (z) mITHuuT A "PEEKING '0RDER_" mHICH wnuLD'HAvE ALL0mED MvSELF T0 0000- ECT THE NnN cnwFuRMING 0000MENT. SPEEIPICALLv'mHEN'THE MEmuRANDUM IN suppuRT 0F THE APPLIEATI0N 000550 THE PETITInN T0 05 "DISMISSED" (1).
FDR NUN-EUMPLIANCE. FRUM'PUINT (A) TU PUINT (Z), I UAS NUT NUTIFIED AS THE RULES STATE AND DIETATE I SHUULD, AND BE GIVEN A UPPURTUNITY TU CURRECT THE DEFECT, PURSUANT TU THE RULES UR GIVEN.A DEADLINE TU CURRECT THE DEFEET.
ELERK AEDSTA, AT.YUUR EARLIEST EUNVIENIENT TIME UUULD YUU PLEASE BE SU KIND AS TU INFURM ME UF THE LUCATIUN DF THE APPLIEAL TIUN AND MEMURANDUM, SU THAT I MAV MAKE ARRANGMENTS TU HAVE THE MUCH NEEDED DDEUMENTS SENT TU ME. I UDULD LIKE TU THANK YUU FUR'YUUR TIME, PATIENEE, AND'PRUFESSIUNALISM IN THIS MATTER._ BEST REEARDB, RLUS MIRELES ¢
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.