§§ 313 /0/,</)\ - ' ' §§§ §11§§\1 @@§§§ §§§§1§1 1§§1§1§§§§§13 CHARLES HALL_JR¢ .=.; @@§ ()5 29§5 1421116 . ’ . .2101 F.M.369 N 10wA PARK_,TX 76367 §§®€§ @§§©@S§@, ©§ @W§< ALLRED UNIT - .. 7 - » DATE: 9- 29- 15 COURT OF cRIMINAL APPEALs-OF TEXAS P.o-Box 12308,cAPIT0L~STA110N' AUSTI:, TEXAS 7871 RE: oBJEcT10N 10 wHiTE ¢ARD DENIAL [cAUSE No.54218-D]AND[€AUSE'N0.54219-D] 8.

POINTS OF ERRORS TO BE RAISED'UNDER FIRST IMPRESSION (1)_JURISDICTION - PAGE ONE OF ONE [4th,14th cGNST.AMEND. V10LAT1ON] (2) 1LLEGAL'€0NF1NEMENT'~ ~“AGE ONE oF Two [CONST. vIOLATION UNDER T11LEzSU.S.c.§§2241(3) (3)DOUBLE_JE0PARDY -cONIINUAT 10N PAGE Two OF THREE{Sch, 6ch,8ch,1lch,&l4th const amend. ] (4)UNLAWFUL & 1LLEGALE NACTMENT OF THE [AEDPA][U. S. C. A. CONS1.§IGLATION UNDER ARTICLE DATE:.NOVEMBER 5 2014 28§§2241(3)1. e. TEXAS CONST. ART 1§§19.]

I AM RAISING AN OBJECTION TO THESE WHITE CARDS WITHOUT A WRlTTEN ORDER.I HAVE A (RIGHT) TO A [FAIR AND PROPER INQUIRY ]

CONCLUSION§"IF I WOULD HAVE HAD A PROPER INQUIRY,WHAT WOULD THE PROPER`OUTCOME HAVE BEEN?WOULD 1 HAVE GONE BACK TO COURT ORWHAT?WHAT IS THE REASON FOR (DENIAL)?

RESPECTFULLY'SUBMITTED CHARLES HALL JR. #1421116 CC FILE