Williams, George
Williams, George
Williams, George
Opinion
E\L Pomz , 1995 1559-qu 01@;9<15 c\»zz)eclf:l,. w\\\mm$ 39 wm L\C\oc@;;oL\ 1495 09)3- 95 0 ‘ :l; F\m u__/_Q/:T;r\x@, m HQPE To miami CQW\¢:<)@,N\QTJ:@A j; \~lw\/€, Tr,@o SIN\PLE. QQ®QQSF / 1 il€c.e¢CY\H §uf>m:r.TTED A W\oTrOd \~`OO.. CQ)\L‘FEW\P OF C;:)Qii(' QQAQL `\'0 “fo@e, GFF:L€_ CM)L® \io@ PLEQ§Q §§ </v\§_ No :\JF “400 {Z/EQ&_D/QQ\ :T am \:lL& w~ am mug :\:T &<zau`r&© 09 @~@¢\:&EQ mg r\\€¥\“ me§t' 55 wald \10@ PL>€A.SQ, SQMQ ma ca O@@Lé§ 34er THv>d\)L\£'OO CWEZ)UE w \\ A ‘ ` mm§~€i:\$w;;:> C¢@<z:r 09 C mm@L 9 PQUL @_EQL, “E©E VEDB BN ;@,;:9>< 1; OF CRlM|NAtL APPEALS OCT 19 29. 5 999%9999991,©0@99
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.