Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Johansson, Sven Erik

Johansson, Sven Erik
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 19, 2015

Johansson, Sven Erik

Opinion

_g@iLQIQ/OB n:t. B, 2015 RECE|VED lN p A B E L'%__ A C 0 5 T A ,, ¢;L 5 R:K COURT OF CR|M|NAL A PEALS Tx. cnuRT nF'cRIMINAL APPEALS~ 1 P.u{ an 12303, capitol station UCT 19205 Austin, Texas 7B711 Abe\Acosta,C|evk RE: Urit NG. UR=53,619-02 TD THE HDN. ABEL AEDSTA, CLERK: Enclnsedrfnr presentment tc the Judge who improperly moved to Dismiss my writ of Habeas>Corpue on bogus issue as my ccn~ Vietinn was Final and‘the issue in challenge is the an action of re~trying me on_the'Same iesue, hence Double Jeoperdy.

Please present this tc the Eourt end send me the name of the eigning Judge. I thank you for your time in this matter.

Respectfully yours, /M9mMN~&J§QMmew“ Even E. Johaneson 1455255 E.T. Terfell'Unit 1300 FM 655 Rusharon, TEXES 77583 _N@+.'Qe '+0 er+ ' l " ‘ ' ’ -nv"c?"lid/\ T'l\\s HZO<)' WrnL ns no+ dust q£s<)u+ 01 60 ' 3+ 15 MOS+\V abou+ QJ€A+QBC€ +hq+ Aqd ernSfFV@d O\‘\c,\ cn“+w +\\e, wmb<xt;ol\ i\qa( expired by 1") \m\Qr\H\J ir Wo\$ 3c1 r\+ev\c,@c} +<> (-`<>Lw years T,D,<,.j_` j have \CMV,O{ m¢,M// C°`£Q"S ky +\\Q C<W\"`+ 04\'<"""‘\;“€1` C‘Pp ams H,\<k+' J+<UL‘@ Q'P+ef Q><P{/"qfion o*` P‘\~Ql'>o\t'mv\ +\\@ D'Mr. Coqr+ losses szsd‘c+,'or\¢ f do no+~ m/\c'@'“57wzc Wt\\/_+"k€ CO<M‘“f` has d,';gm{.g;@¢( m W)~l'+,vv:j-/\c)q+'wr/H@)\ order OI` gas/th -m€ <Av\ Op(portm\\'ty +0 penagle my Wf'+‘.

TEXAS CDURT DF`ERIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN} TEXAS EX PARTE SVEN ERIK JUHANSSUN, § Applicant‘ §4 ¢47»‘ MRIT NU. UR@83,619-02 APPLIBANTFS”REQUEST”FUR ;DEARIFICATION UF ® ART,'TTIU7“DISMISSAU DN%BUGUS'CLAIM

BEPDRE'THE CDURT CUMES`NUUFSVEN[ERIK*JUHNNSSUNA“Applicant pro se, and files this'hls“"Applicant\s.Request§fcr{Elarification of Art. T1207`Dismissal on'BogusFBIaim" of the conviction not being Finalt This [IS]`a bogus claim mhere¢thejcowwiction in original Cause No. 105205“out of Tyler County, Texas`[wasl, in fact, FINAE as'of September 253 20141 (See attached document).

IF, as the documents shou,‘Applicant's semtence for h years probation‘began en 9/26/2007, then simple math and common sense would hold that the probation ended and*ceased to exist on 9/25/ 2011; some TE month [prior} to the Janueryf§ ,‘2013 date that the "Revocation warrant" masjissueo.;lThis~being a tact of Lam, then the Btate had NU JURTBDIETIDNWwith which to base either the bogus "revocation warrant" on nor to even arrest Applicant- Applicant is clearly confused as'io.hom and/or where writ No. 23,6&5 came from-unless it isea different cause"number attach- ~ed to the illegal'revocation action_of`Double Jeopardy. For the Court of.Criminal`Appeals to summarily DISMISS the writ on a 'bogus issue violates_the Doctrine of Stare`Decisis of a_superior Court`in`HAINES'V» Kerner,WhUh U.S.'519y 92“S~Ct.¢59# (1972) in

that "PRU SE CUMPLAINT [can only he oismised] if it appears be- yond a doubt prisoner can prove no set of facts that will entitle him to relief. (qucting Bonley V. Gibson, 355 U.S. h1, h5-h6, 18 S.Ct. 99 (1957).

MHEREFURE, Applicant would so request the Court to take et tis point Judicial`Notice of`this action end consider the Consti¢ tutidnal Violations set-out and raised in'Applicant's properly filed Art. 11.07 writ of Habeas Eorpus or clearly explain how t the Court feels it can dismiss the writ on a clearly bogus issue.

Respectfully submitted, /s/}WMV W//;l l SVen Erik Johansson 1&65256 C.T. Terrell Unit 1300 FM 655 Roshsroo; Texas 77563 `*PREV PRJ-REL-DATE: UNIT COPY IABSZQOO NAME: JOHANSSON{SVEN ERIK T.D;C.J.~INSTITUTIUNAL DIVISlUN INMATE TIMESLIPS 22 2016 *PRES PRJ-REL-DATE= 09 22 2016 *INMATE sTATuS: ` 83 wz§ ” FLAT TIME cREDITED= 2 05 27 soon TIME cREDITED: 1 08 22 BoNus TIME cREDITED:~ 0 00 00 woRK TIME cREDITED: 1 02 25 *TOTAL TIME cREDITED= 5 05 14 *sTATus EFFECT DATE= 12 27 16 PAROLE DATA: SUBMITTED FUR *MONTHLY ABSENCE CALCULATIONX 03/19/15+995 TDC N0: 01465256 uNIT=:Rs RACE= w ‘ MAx-EXP-DATE: 09 22 2016 MAX TERM= 4 00 00 cALc BEGIN DATE=` 09 26 37 TDc REcEIvE DATE: 11 12 07 soon TIME LosT: 0 WORK TIME LOST:

JAIL GOOD TIME RECEIVED: YES BOARD REVIEW 2.0 ABSENCES FOR 02/15 ANV ERRORS lN THE NUMBER OF DAVS OF UNEXCUSED ABSENCES MUST BE REPORTED TO THE ABSENTEE TRACKING COURDINATOR ON YOUR UNIT NO LATER THAN SIX MONTHS.FOLLOWING-THE REPORTED MONTH.

REPORT ERRORS MEANS AGREEMENT WITH THE REPORTED ABSENCES.

F:'~~~ 7 ¢`-:»1 FAILuRE T0`

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.