Patrick Heaney v. State
Patrick Heaney v. State
Opinion
K^0\L tf>. QZ~\£-00*410'C$s
September 2, 2015
ky>e\\ee, ozrk JAxuatI ^^:Jr U>A <A T6wk CooAy E\g-<>T VAp-Tlo^ "Cod gYTOOSio^ OT Tt^g" dggtaSTk To
-CAw^* Wvs ftVoTfo^ Tbg ggAflftttUPfc- Uv feo) sW+y i*fi. ;» o-V <(>$e«A. Xri <»o^^or-lr; ft^fclUvf uaooiL^L^ -fU_ Xi
be S,^-VcvwtW fc1^, Xov£", u:
U-M EL
Vse^.<£.&Y ftX-tfUwAvl.^ tt\%J\&, tax*.-Aw \j»vL* <UAe-^A «<*Vt S ^ro Ve_
IS. *" A ' l " ' x " tl ' —' - * "
\o (V?*aAU Tfc\*l Couj-V £«Ao<»<- yOo. k/OC- ii''Zo?-2.C><±>
ftp f,Al*wV U**. £e_<£u&r-Wi -tUwV ^L*- £i<-r\r- ^cUi_ *i*U~\$.
z^f ^X, "^\«0U \Lw^f XbC'S" ^ ^GTS^ k«'->5 t>rcSe^4Lr <UA ^ ^ ^ ^ ^IVy *V- be,io,y 1U" -U 4^^,
3»H LAv\e- &Z 4o be- W*-l t^ell^Vs. TigsT MpTio>) Toft 6Y-T£a)S>1o^ or Tii^g iOee^>es> Tc? R-egPoOfr To
Ool^c_ ^<es, lv^ \
H*n /^V 51^Zoi< >+
Qfi—OZ-tS-'OotiDr C1L
r *mT 5 Mo -&-• feT .ME&bdEb—TD £&>Pnjoh So (fob kmejJT__u) &$>o\)& Q4v5>£ /l£/she&eb ojJ_
X, d So uetiv \ntpr tA^-q 6^
\ ^ s u>owv^ CXiA^cA iMWa*^ /RECEIVED n, : U* - l - \ SEP 0 2 2015 THIRDCOURT RD COURT OFAPPJATb/ OF APPB %
3^ £>$ F ^ ^ s r 5 CD &/ ^ T^ W in
•si
}»in 1.0
Si 2"
in £i 0 ? ^ i -j A |sss fo4 $5
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.