Joe Payton Lee v. Rita Lemons
Joe Payton Lee v. Rita Lemons
Opinion
ta/thE mnz&srtiTEs&oafiTofPLPPe/tLs tXnift FOR THE PIR6TCIRCUIT ^o u3 1MLT Itt)JlLQhLfi^ _ _^oti020^ i JLot-HtoxL&cLJ^^ ^1&Top^^pwne y ——— y
Qomc.5 AJoyo Hfopz/feejjfLLjkil^^ fejpjicjft n<r> ^ixJlL' l^QQ JQ^£ff^iAAtMll^ jo he, (LlOSjjdiUzU ^n /JnVennber J7. OQ /f5- Qm nof mccKing c|Ax^ ^qm^^4o OlsJq^l hajjtSS of) lnd<9nvifnt/3a^miilr Cou/I Tarn nr>>Q Ktng^Ui^ fequf^l t|4q4 llL OSa Ke.
-fi nancLta ill/ able, s/q r^Q-i [&tT &1_1 Q-f^-o ^f. vW. ^uien kjLg , ThjL i^$£
C>\'\560 XO? CCpL fc pcl/Qnf OH 0<LJob^r 2Z DHLS -forvAjoLfol er/-fo ^qc f&v.y^/oo kje^e 44* -fo/lowi rto flfj^j jna >•=> L ftrpendfj fer jcjjte n\ -tfioo ao7 <g|A ^. VjfV\tnJeoJ 6(ie.fn Al- iSoo 2o? <?\/.
JL Ar?. e^xJbJ-J&JJ- o\-\$&o«o)_Cju ^LJ)oq.Mc^ >2hiicimxnL—01rJ^A2a.ul^ 5, ^urr>m qs)\L-Ju dacm cat Qt- tfjmJLo 7 CV,_ ^avf
? U/)TW10 TO l)t$\Gj\*te. cudJsLgocbi ffrCoicj ^cag^si a nrJ Tft2jo,<>Gf ipi 06VQ.f. ^cKrQai^£& Js. DOflgy/ JddiQroen-r QiM5QgL2Q3-£^ L$llfY\rY)n ft J Xiidarr\es>+ ni-I 5oo 30^? r_i.
-fas^'^'k- ^^ €-rr>a;>). Qppea\£)(iefa\-\Soolo\ <*\i rreo.\<\c+ H C.nn&ta bk OM p^o ri/ v£ud Q, mgjfli: £> I- ) 5 o£l^-QZjC^ jQJL- l^OQ-iUDiL^LK. dfp^\hc\cX Hffr-ai JVif-f <oi1-- /5oo 7Q/ Q ZOJ civ;, CvL : ^ CoXi oMAjla.^Pi le_Jl Xn6+-rurv>en+^ h^^e, toetn Son^Via^stirfMJcl DfiAQ fymnfeffr? fcM-ASufY->mor u ^Jarn-g^LL OLr LS OQ *U?7 C/^, Surnrna-r j Xud3yruLnJt Ol' t?LCLQ-JL&3-£L\l..
Appeal ftf.-eJT Q< *• IS^qlJZOJ-CV CaiLmJlm £lh£JjlsUu mcn+sAaVe. her,/i <*>/?-/• yi* •fasatnile) findrc*> TQjjflz*. flfl in^+r^ rnrnfo ^iltrd U*-S 6z,<\\_ gffcmp+g J $s OanJ vjA^JL&Sii^uoQg^^ .Vnt ^Q-Oii n4:^ 0^fr.^gjt3 ^ Wa-_ia^L P^>is ^AllFlCATLOf MMlQJi .i. >5MCflf under /g/fo/Vy cul />f fyJoh&r ja Sj&LS Qll £>-f<lhe OeTcndQ/it'5 have \^e,^r\ 6f.r\/ed £\/tfU fJoiian I ft/faJinas flltJb>t<Jlrtlr frfkt 6)tirtcf tiff**?} V/'o- fasti ml kt tm(LiI and TcuJwlJIaIu/xAsjl OefftGejJjkcsjph.
y/fr^o
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.