Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Sanadco Inc., a Texas Corporation Mahmoud Ahmed Isba Broadway Grocery, Inc. Shariz, Inc. Ruby & Sons Store, Inc. And Rubina Noorani v. Glenn Hegar, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Comptroller of Public Accounts Office of Comptroller of Public Accounts for the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas

Sanadco Inc., a Texas Corporation Mahmoud Ahmed Isba Broadway Grocery, Inc. Shariz, Inc. Ruby & Sons Store, Inc. And Rubina Noorani v. Glenn Hegar, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Comptroller of Public Accounts Office of Comptroller of Public Accounts for the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 28, 2015

Sanadco Inc., a Texas Corporation Mahmoud Ahmed Isba Broadway Grocery, Inc. Shariz, Inc. Ruby & Sons Store, Inc. And Rubina Noorani v. Glenn Hegar, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Comptroller of Public Accounts Office of Comptroller of Public Accounts for the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-15-00430-CV 7119989 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/28/2015 10:56:48 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-15-00430-CV RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS In The AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/28/2015 10:56:48 AM Third Court of Appeals JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk AT AUSTIN, TEXAS Sanadco Inc., Mahmoud A. Isba, Broadway Grocery, Inc., Shariz, Inc., Ruby & Sons Store, Inc., and Rubina Noorani, APPELLANTS VS. The Office of the Comptroller of Public Accounts; Glenn Hegar, in his individual and official capacities as Comptroller of Public Accounts for the State of Texas; and Ken Paxton in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas, APPELLEES __________________________________________________________ Appeal From Cause No D-1-GN-13-004352 The 250th District Court Of Travis County, Texas The Honorable Karin Crump, Presiding __________________________________________________________ APPELLANT’S ABATEMENT STATUS REPORT ___________________________________________________________

TO THE HON0RABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS: NOW COME SANADCO INC, MAHMOUD AHMED ISBA, BROADWAY GROCERY, INC., SHARIZ, INC., RUBY & SONS STORE, INC., AND RUBINA NOORANI, Appellants in the above-referenced cause, and submit the following status report as ordered by the court in its Memorandum Opinion of August 27, 2015, and reports the following: 1. On September 13, 2005, Appellants propounded its first discovery to Appellee Glenn Hegar, including a Request for Disclosure, First Set of Interrogatories, Request for Admissions and Request for Production.

2. On September 21, 2015, Appellees filed its First Amended Answer and Plea to the Jurisdiction, asserting that this court’s opinion in Sanadco, Inc. v. Office of the Comptroller, 2015 WL 1478200 (Tex. App.—Austin March 25, 2015, pet filed) (mem. op.) has already addressed and disposed of the jurisdictional issues here—by concluding that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the taxpayer’s APA and UDJA claims because Appellants failed to comply with the pre- payment prerequisites of Chapter 112 of the Texas Tax Code. 3. Appellants have not yet filed a responsive pleading, but intends to file a Motion for Summary Judgment challenging these jurisdictional assertions within the next two weeks.

4. On September 25, 2015, the Texas Supreme Court denied, without opinion, the petition for review in Sanadco which could affect the jurisdictional issues raised in the instant case. Appellants’ attorney—who is also the attorney in Sanadco— intends to file a Motion for Rehearing which is due on or before October 12, 2015.

5. The Plea to the Jurisdiction in this cause has been set for hearing on October 22, 2015, and may be dispositive of all the issues involved in this case.

6. As the Motion for Summary Judgment and Plea to the Jurisdiction may potentially yield a final judgment in the trial court, Appellants would respectfully request the court to extend the abatement of this appeal for an additional 90 days to allow for rendition of a final judgment and filing and resolution of post judgment motions, if necessary.

ALL PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellants respectfully request this Court to extend the abatement of this appeal for an additional 90 days to December 28, 2015 to permit conclusion of trial on the merits in this cause.

Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Samuel T Jackson Law Office of Samuel T. Jackson Texas Bar No. 10495700 2315 Vernell Way Round Rock, TX 78664-4617 Mob. (512) 924-5794 Tel. (512) 692-6260 Fax. (866) 722-9685 FOR APPELLANTS Email: [email protected]

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify by my signature above that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing instrument was served on the parties or their attorneys via facsimile, certified mail, return receipt requested, and/or hand delivery on September 28, 2015, in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, to the following: JACK HOHENGARTEN Assistant Attorney General State Bar No. 09812200 Office of the Attorney General Financial Litigation, Tax, and Charitable Trusts Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 Tel: (512) 475-3503 Fax: (512) 477-2348 [email protected] Attorney for Appellees

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.