Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

La Quint Sullivan v. State

La Quint Sullivan v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 7, 2015

La Quint Sullivan v. State

Opinion

atsan ANroNiff r£«; 2015 OCI-7 PI12:0I '^^ITH f,-fiOTTL€.'cLFftK d No. 2015CR7177

PLEA BARGAIN I tha undetslaned Defendant toaethei wilh m» counsel and counsel for the State, agtee that In exchange for theDefendant's guilty or nc'lo eontendcre, to allow the Stale to prove its case tiy means of written sBpulaUons. The State may nrialre JowLer, It Is understood hy all that even In the event the parties agree to recomrnend specific wndilions and lems of adjudication or tha iengih of supervision that such recommendations are not part ofthe (ormaJ plea agreement and are not bii^mg on 1^ underatand end agree that the terms, conditions and length of supervision of wmmunity supenteion or detOOTd adjudftaiteii are assessed solely within the Court's discretion, it Is further understood and agreed by the parties that in the event the Court assowed '®""Sj a length ol supervision of community supervision or deferred adjudication different from those dgreed to by the parties, that such difference sne i constitute grounds (or setting aside theDefendant's plea In this cause. If thecourt grants dsferred adjudieatloii, the Stats does not recortimeno any tami of yean as part ofthe plea agreement All parties sgree thatIf deferred adjudication Issubsequently revolted, Defendant may besentenced to any term of years within the range of puntahment provided by law for this offenae.

It is mutually agreed and recommended by the parties; Prosecution to proceed only on Countjs). .Prosecution for lesser Included offense of.

Defendant agrees that he has been previously convictedof oneftwo or more felonies forenhsnoement under 13.42 P.O. ^Class A Misdemeanor punishmentwith State jailFelonyConviction under 12.44 P.O.

X Punishment to beassessed at 19MONTHS 37"P X Flne1.0tl0.0n ^AMrmative Findingol Deadly Weapon or 30 offense. Defendant not eligiblefor supervision under CCP42.t2,Sec.3 _X_There Is no application for coramunliy supervision/defermd adjudication.

State will make no recommendab'on of Defendant's deferred adjudication/community supervision application. State reserves tight to speak as to factual Issues relevant to Oefendent's punishment.

State opposes community supervision/deferredadjudication.

State recommends community supendsion.

Stale recommends deferred adjudication.

Concurrent wilh; _X_Cau9ea taken into eonBldoratlon; 2015CR2233 (Tampering with Evidence) Restitution to be detaimlned bythe Court through the Community Supervision office or$ Payable to victim inthis cause number only: Payable to victimsunder: ^ Other WAIVER OF APPEAL I understand that upon my plea of guilty or note contendere, where Iha punishment does not exceed that recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by ine. my right to appeal will be limited to only. (1) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on beforetrial, or (2) other matters on which the trial court gives me peimlssion to apped. 1understand (hat I have this limited ilghl to appeal. However, as partofmyplea trergain agreement in this case, Iknowingly and vohintarily waive my right toappeal under (ipand (2) In exchange for (he prosecutors recoi endallon, prowded that thepunishment assessed by thecourt doesnot exceed ouragreemei' -In addit >n if and when I am sentenced Criminal Justice gnMs ca>a/|l hereby request transfer to said institution.

DEFENDANT above teims consfilute our agreement and (here are quest the Court to tolloi plea bargain, u? rJ Assr; t^lSTRICT ATTORNEY ATIORNg DEFENDANT f NOTE: The parties are not allowed to make blnd[ngxa^b^erfts«r£g§ftlM the length ol community supervision or the temio and conditions of tJ community supervision, which ere totally dependent upon the Couifs dbcretlon. The following recommendations do not constlfute part of the fomial plea O. agreement. However, the(State) (both parties) make thefollowing non-binding recommendations: ,.J cn .Community Supervision bograntedfor years r—I .Treatment Altematlve to Incarceration Program .Days InBexarCounty Jailor State Jail (circle one) .Hours Community Sotvico Subslsnceabuse treatment facility .Days Electranic Monitoring _ ^Zero Teleranee Boolcamp or StaleBootcamp Program (circle one) IP _No contact with o OtherPunishment Feoommendalions;. rJ G? r-J K a Jy

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.