Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Hart, Caleb Logan

Hart, Caleb Logan
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 30, 2015

Hart, Caleb Logan

Opinion

PD-1683_1687-15 Ckutft Lo&MJi H*fcT * XU TVaE CoutVT oF V. '* CRXKUlM. /\PPE.NLS THE -5-t^TE. OF TE**S * oF TEXtecBVED|N COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS PRo-«SE KoTXoM Foa E-XTE^SIOU oF TXMt TO q^C S0 2015 file Petition va^ fciscfctrxovaMtH revxew Abel Acosta, Clerk To THE tAottodkavJE. CouaT oF cft.TMiv\ki. kPPEkLS of T6X&V. Cart*-* rvcauui 4\\c Appe\\a«\V / Pet\V*o<\er \<\ +W. abo%;* sA^tal cu>A fvumbe&A cause ar\A fcspecACiWu *v\o\je*i -Wm*» \W\ofa\iYe CbucV Ao e*WJi 4-W \\«\c W •PiIiAft Vkt Akp(iel\QAV-S Pro-S^ PeAiViDA Voc V^creW\a<^ Reviveuj <Xr\ek in 5ujpflo(4 +K«.feoP UoouAdl "SVnGug 4-Ke Cou<4 i-Ke to\\ou}\<\<^'.

1. Tke. s\vAe an^ ALLrwher or AK\t> caus« \tv \\\c Coui\ oV Appeata is'. CaWV Lcj<yxr\lW\ V. TKe SWW oP Te.-wvs !. Af^e^A Nlo's on-i^- ooVU-Cc VWouqK e>T~W\- OoJI^-tft .

2. The ^*^\e °^^ rwjLmher oP V\\\^ (iavx-se la VW. Ty\q\ CouA \s: The SWV-e oP TexQ«s V. C.a\«.Vi Lo<^ar\ Vlact '» Caust «vWs. <*LUJ. Wxtoucjh ^UUo Pro<y> VW. 2>\s\ ftVsW.Y (W\ oP Gravj CouaV^ , Tex^. 'i. The CorNj\c_V\bn uoa^ aW\c«\ed oa VAooe/vsh^r 3Si3o\5 *n Aar\ OacK fe^aAdiea &r a i\eua pur\\^m€A\ pWe an Caus« ^WU..

^. The deadline £o* PiUn^ -Vhe A(ifle\W\S p«AvVi*N &<-

3. k»\ e*Wnsior\ oP \\(x\e TOf A p«\ciri 0$ TMisveAvA C^o") days uiauVd rrsaXUL 4-W_ due. c\aV-e f^WeJh 2.t>i^o\^.

(o, k\o pttof f«c|ue-&A W Ola e*\«vsiOA oP 4-imt Vvxoe heen wvuU.

FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS U i . <» <- • v u.. . J

Abel Acosta, Clerk *T. The VacVs fc\ied apan A<s shbui c^ooci cause ^or \W Ceauesied ev.W\Ston oP \\rf\e. are as Q»\Vou)^ : The A?pt\WA I Pe.V\A\o<\ejr u)a^ represented V*v* Coux\ appovntad couA^tA ciutSn.^ -Vhe appeaA o^ AA\\<» case Ao 4W CoarV a£ A^peaV-s aPVr A-W. CocvvjieAxoAx A-\\e A-C\a\ coucA reAuves Ao appo^A eoucvseA "hi "PiVt Q QjA\V»oa oP* b'\ScrtV\Dnatv^ dexnto . TWetae. \ addiViorvoA Ar\«vc U ncedeJ &>r A-he AppeAWA I fie.A\hoj\er Ao ecAW.r prepare cwd PUe -VW pcVtaoA pfo-st% of U •3e.e.Vc Uaa\ a.s-steAcu\ce in A\\a^ A-W peA\A»OA. \Nhere Gee >Premises Considered i -VW hO0e\\a\\i (L\i\\«x\er re-specA^LW^ Cea.U«t VhaA A-Y\\<» Worxote&Ae CW\ extavcl \ime Aoc PxVvrv^A-W IV\\V\oa Q»r ^vsaetoxvui^ (ta^eo in 4*Y\k Ccur\ Ao VWch ifc> loll*.

Resp<cA&A\\A 5u.WAAfcilx

TcY&a Um\ 3W\3AoAe Uuj^q^

I CoAeV* Lo^QnUofV »Tftci ift Kto. G\<too\o<\vii V>e.\^ p\-esenA\v^ mcoLfceraW a-A -VW tWru TeA^rcl VJUv\ » ftouuW CouaAv^ , T<x<\s V\ere\a^ cWWe LuvAer pe^aAW oP p^rjuri^ AKx\ A-he abooe mer\V\onecl ore Wt ond coCfeci Ao Arta Ex-tcukc\ on A-V 33t\d c\av^ dI b«c«R\W 3-OVb,

20^^

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.