Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Andres Solis Vielma v. State

Andres Solis Vielma v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 16, 2015

Andres Solis Vielma v. State

Opinion

l/> k O 2I1150CT16 PHI2M2 U\ 5 CX 6 KPrMF.. HQHLE.GLE^^f* Q- I -J CJ tl) •n"

f < m p 5c!l uJ 1-. Q h Q F? O 2 11 S 2 L Qti. J < Q ul F o< ^ ij T (Q ui Q U! ul <=i C cU o j- -J? t< a. ^ a . t 2 C <j; 5? H ^ g 2 iP ul < £jd < & u!

TD.TME PduKTM CJ3ufiT DP AOoeA-lA IMSTRJdT ReA&oto. time: Foe. E:yrefu5iDnJ COiDisk<i%\ hP(>E\\ IKrC^T ATTOR.nJ£'-f RgcsuBSTEA, FLEHEAfl-lMJer

PoufiJlA CjOURX DF APPEJUC. nefiK.

PIeRJE- S'DU FinJd /MV)0R.£S SDL.\E Oie.LAA<V Tn£jr^ I'^u. MMdZ- prO'SE. u5HlC.Pl \?) RS- tauESTnOt /Ho APPE-CuAre. ATTDdWOiltO BFHA1_F Of LACK. OF K.ILOuJCE&£. DF r^)£- APPEALS AtuC l"tS PROCESS^ "TD SEEK.

A FAIR_C0URX HEAElfOGj, To RAI^iE. TR.UE FACT5 AvObi PROCEO/JflES. OF THE. CtxJRTS OT TEXAS- n-lF. HFAsoai Foe. A R^HeAfU rufi- Awid ExTEfUeilDAJ are: WEJCE usrihj tO)jrw\e.1lAL y U ftARElfJS- FTt-Pl F .

X..

TA ?u5itH ORaoJ AE IVAL* Coun)EEi_.

To AIHDE^c, g(^£p THAT X ArOnCeEi Uie.lMA UAS UiUAELE-TO UE-mrL UEU3AL COOK?. TO Fl LCL NA OTI DiLfe OR_ TD HAUE. AaJH AOOes.s^ To vP fJ COURT PeftTAirvJiruCr TO THE TiEACi) LitOEg "TO Av\Jp CDU^ MOTlDKJb • -rrr tOOiJ -n4ftr x:. fttvi WECE. A t TTE. DDMir\jfe-£2_ STfiTE-Cnociu THE UAU LI dPfVlRQ OfOLH frlUES lim\Ted time aiDL i t HftS A HDLDirot'S THAT AIIOLLS them-fD HAUE OMLH ^ CCftTAlM LE&AL AAATERjAL- THET BEST TUT rOBetE OF A SQFHElU PEf&OO TUET PRC BEL. \i AiOQ AieD "oO FoR THE IrDBAlsJlT^ oF THE t::^EFEMnHroT ixiHiCH loA'E. &H THE COuR-TE,THe F\RSr i(VJ THE. cuCiiEiAL CiisrftjcrcaaKr.oF a\/A\i:iE- CamnrrQ . TEiyiHE.

EH Ttfe EoioEnJCL- A5v3L lEiTTrOEES LOMC^ KJ13LER. GHaI \ EiO&QO Irv3 COiJKT TO ££EjC THE-. TRiJIETH. the STTATE- L?E13F2-S^fXjfeFT R>6T4 the UdiTTTOES^ FDR- CftDfE-QTTAM^OA TlDrP.

(^3 oF-sO , Tb-TVlEl PbuCtn4 CDURT or CJ^lNA\rOA\ APPB^S DP €)A<u AnJrrtirO iO P\'S!^ TV\C CduRKs PlEAi^m^fV R)R_ l£ELLlE-r 1tO "THl^ (vAATTEliL PLEA^P. rOOTRE All PARTlSi nouoLUeP> \TVJ> ruis Mmrer ccPies ao THAT An PA^IE^ ARE VJ»fV>DEJlS[AfUEitO(s 1P€ Ri&PT Tb REQu^ a TOevJ HEAPifODr Ea6£D osvj twe uaoe OA fv4e\P) ATTERsPB?

Irb TUlS KAATTEP.

PlEAS£ AT THfe TIRE %aL WELP AniD THE MEL? OE THE APPEM.S BdaRE \A WEb cr "To R£SoLOE AAATTjEAS TUlPr Aft£: iJDT Eeeto PAoviBO TO BE EaQTE ; BUT Due PRdles'S THE etate A?D-r PRjo\j\i^EE TfiiAE Facts de G'\u£ tv\e. hEFERSE TPE AdC-TSS ID Eouer THAT IS TOEEl-^D lb RtJIRgSEWT TD TMG_ svme t f u e Face, asud vodv otovPP TAEL ED FAdrb FAC3T> TVAl^S" TFE. btwe eab S£i3u&v^ Lowe suoed^ SvdEP . ffsmiE ^AenJlO X. ^rODG£S UiETImia. TIXT^ \^\s^\'AO'L. SEl^b Ho\Jf£Xs Kr THEL nDM\rofi& urovT.S^aO A^t\\\:!>\o ty. I^vl tuatt xr\s. '&.'£- ^SvcePTEX TAe FoAoiD\K)Gr "XAfNsOVC^DU ^^ECYFuil^

o^EK3^er^mroreraEr- jO -/J -/5 lifiTE-

-itTOd \QL>MU-0 2_ D0VA\<tO&€^ S^TfTE lAjU USSS" CPfetODfti "RD^ S>PiSO A3\5TOtOlD'TK "l'3^^'

f 5 op S"3 V FIL£D._„., mCOUKl OF Ar-!.y^v ,lM>i ANFCHlO- i'->••• sQi^ 2^0CT 16 PM12! 12 KFitr r OZPI

•vj es M n in E hi o (l} "J li) lO

^gCriiP 5^5;

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.