Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2016

Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk

Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 7, 2016

Charlie Willie Jones, Jr. v. Christopher R. Funk

Opinion

Opinion issued January 7, 2016

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00961-CV ——————————— CHARLIE WILLIE JONES, JR., Appellant V. CHRISTOHPER R. FUNK, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1064842

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Charlie Willie Jones, Jr., proceeding pro se, timely filed a notice of appeal on November 17, 2015, from the order denying writ of re-entry, signed by the trial court on November 17, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. However, appellant has neither paid the required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015).

After being notified by the Clerk of this Court on December 14, 2015, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee, appellant filed a “Request to Dismiss Appeal” on December 16, 2015, because “this is not a final order.” TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.1(a)(1), 42.3. We construe this request as a motion to dismiss on the ground that the order appealed from was not a final order. Also, though there is no certificate of conference with the motion, this motion has been on file with the Court for more than 10 days and no party has responded to the motion.

See id. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.