Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2016

Ricardo Rodriguez Calderon v. State

Ricardo Rodriguez Calderon v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 14, 2016

Ricardo Rodriguez Calderon v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00714-CR

Ricardo Rodriguez Calderon, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR-14-0384, THE HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before January 25, 2016. See id. at 321.

It is ordered on January 14, 2016.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.