Thomas Issac Seaton v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-16-00018-CR
THOMAS ISSAC SEATON APPELLANT V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1402730D ----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ----------
Appellant Thomas Issac Seaton attempts to appeal from a judgment convicting him of possession of between one and four grams of methamphetamine. The trial court’s certification states that this “is a plea- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On January 15, 2016, we notified Seaton that the appeal would be dismissed pursuant to the trial court’s certification unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response on or before January 25, 2016, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. Seaton filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Therefore, in accordance with the trial court’s certification, we dismiss the appeal.2 See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: February 11, 2016
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.