TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00113-CV

Peter E. Pratt, Jr., Appellant v. The State of Texas, et al., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GV-08-001748, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Peter E. Pratt, Jr., claiming to be acting in the capacity of a court-appointed receiver in a post-judgment equitable receivership,1 filed a notice of appeal challenging a trial court order granting an accounting. The appellate record must include the clerk’s record from the trial court.2 The clerk’s record in this cause was due in this Court on March 3, 2016, but no record was filed.3 We received notice from the Travis County district clerk’s office on March 7, 2016, that Pratt has neither paid nor made arrangement for payment of the record.4 If the clerk’s record is not filed because the appellant failed to pay, this Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.5 The record before us does not elaborate further regarding the subject of the receivership.

See Tex. R. App. P. 34.1, 34.5(a).

See id. R. 35.1(b).

Nor has Pratt preserved any claim that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs.

See id. R. 20.1(2), 37.3(b).

See id. R. 37.3(b).

On March 9, 2016, we sent notice to Pratt that the clerk’s record was overdue and that the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution if Pratt did not make arrangements for the clerk’s record or submit a status report to this Court on or before March 21, 2016. To date, Pratt has not responded in any way, and the clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.6

__________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: May 26, 2016

See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).