Jose Francisco Escamilla v. State

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00180-CR

JOSE FRANCISCO ESCAMILLA,

Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 66th District Court

Hill County, Texas

Trial Court No. 38,991

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jose Francisco Escamilla appeals from the trial court’s interlocutory order denying his motion to suppress. The denial of a motion to suppress may not be appealed until after the final judgment is entered. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1991) (“The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 22, 2016

Do not publish [CR25]

Escamilla v. State Page 2