James Copeland v. State

Affirmed and Opinion Filed June 28, 2016

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00988-CR

JAMES LAWRENCE COPELAND, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-58889-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Francis

A jury convicted James Lawrence Copeland of aggravated assault, deadly weapon, involving family violence and assessed punishment at thirty years in prison. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. After reviewing counsel’s brief, appellant’s pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 150988F.U05

S Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JAMES LAWRENCE COPELAND, On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Appellant Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-58889-M. No. 05-15-00988-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis.

Justices Fillmore and Schenck participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered June 28, 2016.