Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016

in Re George Horace Richardson

in Re George Horace Richardson
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided July 7, 2016 · No. 01-16-00465-CR
in Re George Horace Richardson

Opinion

Opinion issued July 7, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas ————————————

NO. 01-16-00465-CR ———————————

IN RE GEORGE HORACE RICHARDSON, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, George Horace Richardson, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to rule on his motion for new trial.1 A motion for new trial is overruled by operation of law if the trial court does not rule on the motion within seventy-five days after suspending or imposing sentence in open court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.8. Accordingly, relator has not demonstrated entitlement to mandamus relief.

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. George Horace Richardson, Cause No. 1417213, in the 176th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Stacey Bond presiding.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.