DENY; and Opinion Filed July 12, 2016.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00677-CV IN RE VINCENT PASCO, Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-12-59001 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Myers In this petition for writ of mandamus, relator complains that the trial court has not ruled on his Chapter 64 Motion for DNA testing, which he filed on March 4, 2016. Relator asks this Court to order the trial court to rule on the motion. Relator’s petition is not certified as required by rule 52.3(j) of the rules of appellate procedure. Although this deficiency alone constitutes sufficient reason to deny mandamus relief, in the interest of judicial economy we address the petition.

Relator’s petition is premature and does not include a record showing that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d 659, 661 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, orig. proceeding) (noting trial courts are entitled to a reasonable time in which to rule and determining six-month delay was not unreasonable); see also In re Harris, No. 14–07–231–CV, 2007 WL 1412105, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 15, 2007, orig. proceeding) (holding relator not entitled to mandamus relief when record did not show relator alerted trial court of motion by setting for submission or hearing).

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ Lana Myers LANA MYERS JUSTICE

160677F.P05

–2–