DENY; and Opinion Filed July 15, 2016.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00798-CV IN RE DEBRA ARNITA EPPS, IRVING HOLDINGS, INC. D/B/A YELLOW CAB, AND HINES AUTO LLC, Relators Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-00843 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus in which they contend the trial court lacked jurisdiction to reinstate the underlying case. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ Craig Stoddart CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE

160798F.P05

–2–