Barry Arthur Brown v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas July 18, 2016 No. 04-15-00706-CR Barry Arthur BROWN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2014CR7118A Honorable Philip Kazen, Judge Presiding ORDER
Appellant has filed a pro se motion requesting permission to supplement the brief filed by appellate counsel. Appellant is represented by Mr. James Oltersdorf. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.
_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of July, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.