Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2016

Barry Arthur Brown v. State

Barry Arthur Brown v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 18, 2016

Barry Arthur Brown v. State

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 18, 2016 No. 04-15-00706-CR Barry Arthur BROWN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR7118A Honorable Philip Kazen, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant has filed a pro se motion requesting permission to supplement the brief filed by appellate counsel. Appellant is represented by Mr. James Oltersdorf. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.