Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016

Claudia Forsterling v. Presidio at Clear Lake

Claudia Forsterling v. Presidio at Clear Lake
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided July 26, 2016 · No. 01-16-00269-CV
Claudia Forsterling v. Presidio at Clear Lake

Opinion

Opinion issued July 26, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas ————————————

NO. 01-16-00269-CV ———————————

CLAUDIA FORSTERLING, Appellant

V.

PRESIDIO AT CLEAR LAKE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1074099

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Claudia Forsterling, proceeding pro se, has neither paid the required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West Supp. 2015), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2015); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified by the Clerk of this Court on April 25, 2016, and again on June 9, 2016, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the required fees, appellant did not timely respond. See id. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Massengale.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.