Benito Santibanez v. Alejandro Diron

Opinion issued August 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas ————————————

NO. 01-16-00231-CV ———————————

BENITO SANTIBANEZ, Appellant

V.

ALEJANDRO DIRON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 121-DCV-202428

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Benito Santibanez has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.