Benito Santibanez v. Alejandro Diron
Benito Santibanez v. Alejandro Diron
Opinion
Opinion issued August 2, 2016
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00231-CV ——————————— BENITO SANTIBANEZ, Appellant V. ALEJANDRO DIRON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 434th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 121-DCV-202428
MEMORANDUM OPINION Benito Santibanez has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.