Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016

Sarah Cannon v. State

Sarah Cannon v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided August 3, 2016 · No. 12-16-00157-CR
Sarah Cannon v. State

Opinion

NO. 12-16-00156-CR

12-16-00157-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS SARAH CANNON, § APPEALS FROM THE 217TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss these appeals. The motion is signed by Appellant and her counsel. No decision has been delivered in the appeals. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeals are dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Opinion delivered August 3, 2016.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

AUGUST 3, 2016

NO. 12-16-00156-CR

SARAH CANNON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 217th District Court of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2016-0144)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

AUGUST 3, 2016

NO. 12-16-00157-CR

SARAH CANNON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 217th District Court of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2016-0048)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.