Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2016

in Re: Winton & Associates, Inc.

in Re: Winton & Associates, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 17, 2016

in Re: Winton & Associates, Inc.

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: § No. 08-16-00176-CV WINTON & ASSOCIATES, INC., § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relator. § IN MANDAMUS § MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Winton & Associates, Inc., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Honorable Javier Alvarez asking that we order Respondent to set aside an order denying Relator’s plea in abatement and order the parties to arbitration. We deny mandamus relief.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. In re Prudential Insurance Company of America, L.L.C., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992). First, the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential, 148 S.W.3d at 135. Second, it must demonstrate that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential, 148 S.W.3d at 135-36; In re McAllen Medical Center, Inc., 275 S.W.3d 458, 462 (Tex. 2008). Based on the petition and record before us, we conclude that Relator has failed to establish it is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX.R.APP.P. 52.8. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice August 17, 2016 Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.