Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016

Jamie v. Villasenor v. Cequel III Communications I, LLC D/B/A Suddenlink Communications and Knight-Hawk Security Services, Inc.

Jamie v. Villasenor v. Cequel III Communications I, LLC D/B/A Suddenlink Communications and Knight-Hawk Security Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided August 17, 2016 · No. 12-16-00222-CV
Jamie v. Villasenor v. Cequel III Communications I, LLC D/B/A Suddenlink Communications and Knight-Hawk Security Services, Inc.

Opinion

NO. 12-16-00222-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JAMIE V. VILLASENOR, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT V.

§ JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I, LLC D/B/A SUDDENLINK COMMUNICATIONS AND KNIGHT- HAWK SECURITY SERVICES, INC., § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEES

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

By letter dated August 1, 2016, this Court notified Appellant that the filing fee in this appeal is due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. Appellant was informed that failure to remit the filing fee, on or before August 11, 2016, would result in the Court’s taking appropriate action, including dismissal of the case without further notice. The date for paying the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request.

Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered August 17, 2016.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT AUGUST 17, 2016 NO. 12-16-00222-CV

JAMIE V. VILLASENOR,

Appellant

V. CEQUEL III COMMUNICATIONS I, LLC D/B/A SUDDENLINK COMMUNICATIONS AND KNIGHT-HAWK SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,

Appellees

Appeal from the 241st District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 14-0726-C)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.