Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016

Leslie Anne Gower and/or Any and All Occupants and/or Residents of the Premises v. Richard Womeldorf, as Independent of the Estate of John W. Womeldorf

Leslie Anne Gower and/or Any and All Occupants and/or Residents of the Premises v. Richard Womeldorf, as Independent of the Estate of John W. Womeldorf
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided September 2, 2016 · No. 13-16-00298-CV
Leslie Anne Gower and/or Any and All Occupants and/or Residents of the Premises v. Richard Womeldorf, as Independent of the Estate of John W. Womeldorf

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00298-CV COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ LESLIE ANNE GOWER AND/OR ANY AND ALL OCCUPANTS AND/OR RESIDENTS OF THE PREMISES, Appellants, v.

RICHARD WOMELDORF, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN W. WOMELDORF, DECEASED, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellants, Leslie Anne Gower and/or any and all Occupants and/or Residents of the Premises, appealed a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas. On June 3, 2016, the Clerk of this Court requested that appellant pay the filing fee for this appeal. On July 19, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $205.00 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $205.00 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. All pending motions are likewise DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed this 2nd day of September, 2016.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.