Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016

Bright Land & Cattle, LLC v. PG-M International, LLC, PG-M International Operating, LLC, and Matra Petroleum U.S.A.

Bright Land & Cattle, LLC v. PG-M International, LLC, PG-M International Operating, LLC, and Matra Petroleum U.S.A.
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided September 14, 2016
Bright Land & Cattle, LLC v. PG-M International, LLC, PG-M International Operating, LLC, and Matra Petroleum U.S.A.

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-16-00235-CV

BRIGHT LAND & CATTLE, LLC, APPELLANT

V.

PG-M INTERNATIONAL, LLC, PG-M INTERNATIONAL OPERATING, LLC, AND MATRA PETROLEUM U.S.A., APPELLEES

On Appeal from the 100th District Court Carson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11430, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding September 14, 2016

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

On September 8, 2016, appellant, Bright Land & Cattle, LLC, filed a motion to dismiss its appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date and without passing on the merits of the appeal, we grant the motion and dismiss appellant’s appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because appellant’s motion does not address costs, costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). If dismissal will prevent appellees from seeking relief to which they would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellees to file a timely motion for rehearing. No motion for rehearing from appellant will be entertained.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.