Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016

T. J. Theis v. Goodyear in Its Assumed or Common Name Including the Goodyear Tire Rubber Company

T. J. Theis v. Goodyear in Its Assumed or Common Name Including the Goodyear Tire Rubber Company
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided September 27, 2016
T. J. Theis v. Goodyear in Its Assumed or Common Name Including the Goodyear Tire Rubber Company

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-16-00266-CV

12931122 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/27/2016 3:32:40 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK No. 03-16-0266-CV

FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS In the 9/27/2016 3:32:40 PM

Court of Appeals for the JEFFREY D. KYLE

Clerk

Third District of Texas ________________________________ T.J. THEIS

Appellant v.

WAL-MART IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME, INCLUDING WAL-MART STORES TEXAS LLC; AND GOODYEAR IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME, INCLUDING THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER

COMPANY

Appellee ________________________________

On Appeal from the 126th Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-1-GN-10-00151

________________________________

GOODYEAR’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO RELEASE A COPY OF

REPORTER’S RECORD VOLUME 9 TO GOODYEAR

________________________________ TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellee The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1, files this motion to release a copy of Reporter’s Record Volume 9 to Goodyear and would respectfully show the Court as follows:

Plaintiff’s lawsuit arises from a single-vehicle crash near Cameron, Milam County, Texas. At trial, Plaintiff’s tire expert, William Woehrle, testified Goodyear defectively manufactured the crash-vehicle’s tire, and the resulting loss of tire pressure caused the driver to lose control. Following Woehrle’s testimony, the trial court directed a verdict for Goodyear and stuck Woehrle’s opinions. Plaintiff appealed.

During his testimony, Woehrle referenced confidential Goodyear documents now contained in Reporter’s Record Volume 9. To protect Goodyear’s confidential materials,1 the trial court sealed Volume 9. RR Vol. 1, at 9-11; CR 192; Ex. A. On appeal, this Court designated Volume 9 as “view only.”

The purpose of this motion is to request a narrow exception to the Court’s “view-only” designation. Goodyear’s Houston-based counsel cannot copy Volume 9—which includes materials pertinent to its response brief—for use outside the courthouse. These strictures hinder Goodyear’s ability to fully and properly brief the issues raised by Plaintiff/Appellant in his brief.

Goodyear and its counsel appreciate this Court’s (and the trial court’s) treatment of Goodyear’s confidential materials. If the Court grants this motion, Goodyear’s counsel will—of course—continue to maintain the confidentiality of Goodyear’s materials and abide by the trial court’s order governing confidential materials. CR 19-29.

PRAYER

Goodyear asks this Court to direct the Clerk of the Court to release a copy of Reporter’s Record Volume 9 to Goodyear’s counsel. In addition, Goodyear prays for any other relief to which it is entitled.

Respectfully Submitted:

By: /s/ David R. Tippetts

David R. Tippetts State Bar No. 20065250 [email protected] Matthew E. Coveler State Bar No. 24012462 [email protected] Thad K. Jenks State Bar No. 24007441 [email protected]

Weinstein Tippetts & Little LLP 7500 San Felipe, Ste. 500 Houston, Texas 77063 Telephone: 713.244.0800 Facsimile: 713.244.0801 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

RULE 10.1(a)(5) CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Rule 10.1(a)(5) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I hereby certify that before filing this motion on September 27, 2016, I provided Appellant’s counsel of record by email a draft of the foregoing motion to release a copy of Reporter’s Record Volume 9 to Goodyear. Appellant’s counsel indicated he is unopposed to this motion.

/s/ David R. Tippetts David R. Tippetts Dated: September 27, 2016

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that pursuant to Rule 9.5(e) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, a true and correct copy of this motion was forwarded to the following counsel of record through the electronic filing manager and by email:

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kyle Farrar Mark Bankston FARRAR & BALL, LLP 1010 Lamar, Suite 1600 Houston, Texas 77002

/s/ David R. Tippetts David R. Tippetts Dated: September 27, 2016

4834-1952-3385, v. 3 EXHIBIT A

1 Volume 9 does not include any materials designed “Confidential” by Plaintiff/Appellant.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.