Daniel Hearn, Individually and as Agent for His Father, Richard F. Hearn v. Amy Eskelund

Opinion issued November 8, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas ————————————

NO. 01-16-00264-CV ———————————

DANIEL HEARN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AGENT FOR HIS FATHER, RICHARD F. HEARN, Appellant

V.

AMY ESKELUND, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 446,788

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an interlocutory appeal from a temporary injunction prohibiting appellant Daniel Hearn from taking certain actions regarding his father’s trust account. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(a)(4). Appellee Amy Eskelund filed a notice informing this court that the trial court had dissolved the temporary injunction that was the subject of this appeal. We notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless Hearn filed a response demonstrating jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). No response has been filed.

This appeal is moot, and we dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction. See id.; Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 166–67 (Tex. 2012).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.