Anthony Simon v. Kaytron Patric Curlin
Anthony Simon v. Kaytron Patric Curlin
Opinion
Opinion issued November 10, 2016
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00361-CV ——————————— ANTHONY SIMON, Appellant V. KAYTRON PATRIC CURLIN, Appellee
On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-13089
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Anthony Simon, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1, 37.3(b); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2016); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified by this Court’s Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution on September 8, 2016, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution for failure to pay the required fees, appellant did not timely respond.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. See id. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.