in Re Ardell Nelson, Jr.
in Re Ardell Nelson, Jr.
Opinion
•
TVl TWE November 21, 2016 CMtf OF KWtlW^
03-16-00717-CV
AWEM FW)F\ "W\F 3>2A* ^\atlf\VD15\?M:A COURT -\m\\5 COUWN Tflfcfo, CAVWfcTID 03 OD7I7-CV RULE 4<U. MOTMFDK EXWfM DV T1V\£ VMM *flKfc. MS. OV fm\_\Jvft ?£DttMlE
-to "TWbd court of topAb MEK\flWkwoum opivmu. ^ ^t\c\W. Ksni i* kuWt o^%vS vVK\oWv &t\ftV \^0( ^RECEiV KOV 2 i 2016 THIRD ?b(i) \ It
4^ ^Acagy'. K\^\Mwrt( VxrthfA US€ WH9Ma t& being \s ftl\ DM AWt^ lev e£.W\eJi ivi %l\Oiia^ Alii Ab Drafted
DfiwuA', WmK tld CaiAT^ /yf t\f?tf,\s CWiWS ttAxj/l has t&\*A \d ^'\At V*\\b CguyV m'M/\ (X CdH /)f Wvl N\cW> ftftt vuta da WaA w\ck\d\fcv cmi o^tv ADfyMimet\w\ iiilicAivij x? toon rf
tart dJ S\^\s OfiM rtW W Vim »t z7 Stooftvi JW1W1-V ——————^————— »
"I, taM\\\k\bsn"Xf*4#2,\&2 x.nm s^und fining ayv>\ (V^PaU 6TAT£L*io V,f.£,A 132,M tw hbt, M fiftn Cafe i£U/>3
j:llH dz> VvBYfby ftferrt We pC toe At\'\MirM A •
TO ^Y\\5 ?Y\WM&Afatom rffeftb ^WrVm^!
CPllXA *C Kpm\s TWT^ U®k\£K ?•• C>. fioY \25q7 i, t cm P>Vt * £*$i«4ifcl on 4V\b DaU^;fl|L YlbD FK £65 ^^aron^i71SR3 CflURT ^r fo^Vi
787iiS3S47 BOG7 '>''huiiH'h"i"ii"iliili'l'iii'i'uiii'ili'ii"iiiilii'
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.