Daniel Alan Sliger v. Audra Renee Rodriguez
Daniel Alan Sliger v. Audra Renee Rodriguez
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-16-00200-CV
Daniel Alan Sliger, Appellant v. Audra Renee Rodriguez, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-13-003895, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Daniel Alan Sliger, pro se, has appealed a final divorce decree that ended his marriage to Audra Renee Rodriguez, awarded Rodriguez sole managing conservatorship of two children, and restricted Sliger’s possession and access. In lieu of a conventional appellant’s brief, Sliger has filed a two-page “Administrative notice to proceed without non-required Brief” that incorporates or refers us to his earlier-filed petition for writ of mandamus challenging the same decree, docketed as Cause No. 03-16-00329-CV. We have previously denied Sliger’s mandamus petition,1 and similarly conclude that these arguments fail to demonstrate any reversible error by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm the decree.2
See In re Sliger, No. 03-16-00329-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 7001, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin July 1, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
We dismiss as moot Rodriguez’s motion to dismiss Sliger’s appeal for noncompliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. __________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field Affirmed Filed: December 14, 2016
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.