in Re: Ace Parking Management, Inc.

DENY; and Opinion Filed December 29, 2016.

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-01478-CV

IN RE ACE PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-05179

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Evans

Before the Court is relator’s December 21, 2016 amended petition for writ of mandamus. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator’s amended petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny as moot relator’s December 27, 2016 motion to stay trial setting.

/David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

161478F.P05