Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2017

Araceli Zapata D/B/A El Super, Veljaco Corp., Inc, D/B/A El Super Meat Market & Taqueria and Carmen Gloria Veljanovich v. Clear Creek Independent School District, the City of Webster and Harris County

Araceli Zapata D/B/A El Super, Veljaco Corp., Inc, D/B/A El Super Meat Market & Taqueria and Carmen Gloria Veljanovich v. Clear Creek Independent School District, the City of Webster and Harris County
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 10, 2017

Araceli Zapata D/B/A El Super, Veljaco Corp., Inc, D/B/A El Super Meat Market & Taqueria and Carmen Gloria Veljanovich v. Clear Creek Independent School District, the City of Webster and Harris County

Opinion

Opinion issued January 10, 2017

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00436-CV ——————————— ARACELI ZAPATA D/B/A EL SUPER, VELJACO CORP., INC, D/B/A EL SUPER MEAT MARKET & TAQUERIA AND CARMEN GLORIA VELJANOVICH, Appellants V. CLEAR CREEK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, THE CITY OF WEBSTER, AND HARRIS COUNTY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-04925

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Araceli Zapata d/b/a El Super, Veljaco Corp., Inc, d/b/a El Super Meat Market & Taqueria and Carmen Gloria Veljanovich, have failed to timely file their appellate brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), (d), 38.8(a)(1). On October 20, 2016, this Court ordered appellants to file their brief, without a reporter’s record, within thirty days of that Order. See id. 37.3(c), 38.6(a). Because appellants failed to timely file their brief, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants on December 9, 2016, that this appeal was subject to dismissal if they failed to timely file their appellate brief or an extension motion within ten days of the date of that notice.

See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c). Appellants failed to file a timely response.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Lloyd.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.