Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2017

Connie Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge, Richard Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge and Richard Rogge as Administrator of the Estate of Richard Hollas Rogge v. the City of Richmond, Texas

Connie Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge, Richard Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge and Richard Rogge as Administrator of the Estate of Richard Hollas Rogge v. the City of Richmond, Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 10, 2017

Connie Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge, Richard Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge and Richard Rogge as Administrator of the Estate of Richard Hollas Rogge v. the City of Richmond, Texas

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Appellate case name: Connie Rogge, Individually and as heir of Richard Hollas Rogge, Richard Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge and Richard Rogge as Administrator of the Estate of Richard Hollas Rogge v. The City of Richmond, Texas Appellate case number: 01-14-00866-CV Trial court case number: 11-DCV-194261 Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County Date motion filed: October 14, 2016 Party filing motion: Appellants It is ordered that the motion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale Acting for the Court Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.

Keyes, J., dissenting from the denial of en banc rehearing.

Date: January 10, 2017

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.