Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2017

Amarillo II Enterprises, LLC D/B/A Amarillo Center for Skilled Care Creative Solutions in Healthcare, Inc. Paula Flores And Todd Gudgell v. Thomas Sames, M.D.

Amarillo II Enterprises, LLC D/B/A Amarillo Center for Skilled Care Creative Solutions in Healthcare, Inc. Paula Flores And Todd Gudgell v. Thomas Sames, M.D.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 8, 2017

Amarillo II Enterprises, LLC D/B/A Amarillo Center for Skilled Care Creative Solutions in Healthcare, Inc. Paula Flores And Todd Gudgell v. Thomas Sames, M.D.

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-16-00473-CV

AMARILLO II ENTERPRISES, LLC D/B/A AMARILLO CENTER FOR SKILLED CARE; CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE, INC.; PAULA FLORES; AND TODD GUDGELL, APPELLANTS V. THOMAS SAMES, M.D., APPELLEE On Appeal from the 181st District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 105779-B, Honorable John B. Board, Presiding February 8, 2017 Order on Abatement Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

Amarillo II Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Amarillo Center for Skilled Care, Creative Solutions Healthcare, Inc., Paula Flores and Todd Gudgell (appellants) appeal from the denial of their motion to stay the underlying litigation pending resolution of binding arbitration. Thomas Sames, appellee, filed a petition to investigate a potential claim or claims against appellants pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202 which was granted by the trial court. Appellants filed this appeal regarding their motion to stay the proceedings pending arbitration. They also filed an original proceeding for mandamus relief from the court’s order granting the 202 petition. This court conditionally granted the mandamus in cause number 07-17-00005-CV on February 3, 2017. In that opinion, we ordered the trial court to “1) vacate its December 20, 2016 order (and all subsequent orders) granting Sames discovery under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202.1 et seq, and 2) determine whether the parties executed an enforceable arbitration clause encompassing the issues to be asserted in the anticipated suit of Sames as explained in his live Rule 202 pleading.” We gave the trial court thirty days from the February 3rd date to comply. Because the issue in the present appeal involves the same issue of arbitration as was in the mandamus, we abate the appeal pending the trial court’s compliance of this court’s directive. All appellate deadlines will be held in abeyance until further order of the court.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.