Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2017

in the Interest of J.B.C., a Child

in the Interest of J.B.C., a Child
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 15, 2017

in the Interest of J.B.C., a Child

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-16-00444-CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.B.C., A CHILD

From the 378th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 87326D

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant C.M.C. and Appellee M.S.W. have filed a “Joint Motion for Disposition of Appeal Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(A).” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The parties state that they have reached an agreement resolving the matters that are disputed in this appeal and request that we render judgment effectuating that agreement. The parties have agreed to the disposition of this appeal as follows:  Paragraph 6 on page 13 of the judgment signed on September 27, 2016 by the trial court shall be modified to read as follows: “Designation of Competent Adult – Each conservator may designate any competent adult to pick up and return the child, as applicable. IT IS ORDERED that a conservator or a designated competent adult be present when the child is picked up or returned.”

 Paragraph 9 on page 13 of the judgment signed on September 27, 2016 by the trial court shall be modified to read as follows: “All discussions relating to possession and any related arrangements for the child shall be between [C.M.C.] and [M.S.W.] only and neither party shall involve third parties in such discussions.”

 The judgment signed on September 27, 2016 by the trial court shall be affirmed as modified.

 All costs will be taxed against C.M.C.

We grant the parties’ joint motion. We modify paragraph 6 on page 13 of the trial court’s Order in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship, signed on September 27, 2016, to read as follows: “Designation of Competent Adult – Each conservator may designate any competent adult to pick up and return the child, as applicable. IT IS ORDERED that a conservator or a designated competent adult be present when the child is picked up or returned.” We also modify paragraph 9 on page 13 of the trial court’s Order in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship, signed on September 27, 2016, to read as follows: “All discussions relating to possession and any related arrangements for the child shall be between [C.M.C.] and [M.S.W.] only and neither party shall involve third parties in such discussions.” We affirm the trial court’s Order in Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship as modified. Costs are taxed against C.M.C.

In re J.B.C. Page 2 REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted; affirmed as modified Opinion delivered and filed March 15, 2017 [CV06]

In re J.B.C. Page 3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.