V- • 0H>n on**n ORIGINAL 2M.THE couRT of Lkl/MA/AL hPPEALS OF TEXA£ "gECESVED IN FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS TkSUS FEliPE LOPEZ MAR 2 3 2017 mar 23 z::? -V£- Abel Acosta, Clerk Abel Acosta, Clerk THE 4TATE OF TEXAS

PETiTiOA/ HA/ CAUSE A/O. cRl?77*4 AMD CftXZBSH PKo/a THE ar1** DiST&leT couRT OF KHown cdiAhty, T-tXAS A/ID THE CouRT OF APPEAL* FoU THE ElEVEA/TH DISTRICT oF TEXAZ^ NO. ll-llf-OOZST

PETITION FaR DtSCKETtOA/AKY REVIEW

JEJUS FEliPE LOPEZ-

MiCkad unit, QUiaf Fm X69V-f Te.nneis.ee Colon Y, TX ?tr2tfa PRo-SE

(APPELLAaYT HE&uESTS a/0 oKAL AK&u/y\ea/\) a/amb< nF ALL PART\FC JUDGE Honorable ST^Phth El/is IT1* biSTriCT coa&T TUctet.

ATTOR/I/EY FoR THE Sf-a.it. oa/ APPEAL t Ctik\ST\A/A A/EISOIV AUitCLht District Attorney, Krovfij county

TfUAL COUNSEL 5TUART HoLDBA/ P.O. &0X i n bck.llIn3 tr, TK 76>?3~\

AftorntV \rok APPEAL 1 APPellcute Counsel: Tim coPelfrhd P.O. tsx 3<M CcJ^r Pa-rkjTr 7XL13

-1- TAfilE QFXQ/*TEA/TS_ PAGE /va/nes of cell Parti eS i c » Tai/e of Lovitthf5 11

Xhofex of Authorities 111

stAte/r\e.nt ke3a,rdin£ a/o oroul ArSUmtnt 1 £fcuf€,m€hf Of the CClS^ 1 StcLf?/H.£tit of PtoC-cdur&l H/ifory 1 Qrtouhd for Rtvieti/ — At9Uwent Pray-er for Mlzf 3

c*rf\-EiLaf-e of service H Declaration fverlficjouilon ti

APPE//DIX S court of APPectlS' M-z/nafdun dUM opinion £XtW3IT t*± Mtmorandu/n opinion of th-e ElEVE/iW court of APPecL/5 EXH/B/TJtA QP/hloft of mofioh of RE-HecurlyiQ undtr -HultS APPtllcLnt Procedure WJj of th£ ElEVEA/Tti court at APPvaulS

ll fEQEMl. PA&£ Hotte&koJ V, Uhiftd StateS, 23L? U.S. 1ro)lLS'l b>(a S. Ct+ IA34, i%H7 HO L.Bd,lCr7 (MtbL _ 3

S±A1£ HeirSheets V, State} 3V-2 f.t^. id HI,13 -M CW.cr/m. AfP. ion J — — & ToknSor) V. J-hcvtf, 1(&7 i.K xd H10, Hi7 CTcX.crl/h.. AM i*#) _ JL Motilieu v. 5tate, 7f ^v. 3d ?TZ,?><rL, CT^.cr;.<n.AMW°&) -^ _ __ 2 scott \r.s-teuic, X%7 <,.w. 2 d L7D) bio Crc^cr;^ ,APP. Mo?) .2

Hi J+AtEMf-AsT REC-APDlA/6 A/nofiaA A&MjmlMT

a/o ora,l cA.r3umtr\T is refuested beCu-utSe, c_s urlU t>*? £hoi^n heloWt Th£ -trio,! record Clea.rH CStccbliSh t>£ th-e evidence - STAT&ABArt a.F THE CASE- on The 'WTh Ua,y aP A u3 UST. XoH t Tesui FEliPE LoPEt.,( 'StPPellanT^) WtL<> convicted In the 2rrh District Court of Brown county,T£xAs a-nd s-en t-ctnLed to life without Pa-tol*. In the T-tXouS b-e.Pa.rtfluent 6F triMl/vaJ Justice ih ca.ui-t &ii-it4-0o&3$~/u-iH-oo23Li Tor the offense Of Continuous lexacul a,buS~e of a. Chlldj S.M.L Co. Pseudoh ya\J in tri&l courT caub-Z number ck-X%^<TH ill- m~ ootek-cp)j z^n d \r oulSo Revoked APPe/le,nii ro/n/nunltY supervision for a- theft off-ense In tried ccurr LCLui-e number cP.~if77^ Ltheft ov-tr 1,5-60 but undir 10j000iiii-h-00J~sr)) Th-e rrlU court then <z.<£eSJed Punishment on rn^ Theft cha.r3e a.r Two cA) Years Incarceration In th* Lt-cutt Tu.il Division of the Depart/vxent ofcri/nlncul TuStiC-e..

APfella.nt f^/-e du~e notlc-t- of o-Pfea^l frO/m both TudS/nerttJ and Sent-encei. S-ee L C.A, £, P, llr) Lc.d. I, P. ISL ) .

STATE MEArT of PAnrEDuBAt tf/sfo/tr an AiaSuST \Zj3~olL, the. ElBVEhth court of a^PPea/i a-ffir/ned Th-£- Ttia.1 eaurfi TvidQ/nent of ran Tin uo U-S sexual c^bui-e of a. Chlld) and th-e Theft cha.r3e of Lumd-cr XOjOOO oV-er i^c~oOl.

FlUd au exTeniiori (two) t;/n«I for /notion for fL*L~Heu.rln& which Were G-ra.nte.dj. Appellant Flud the /notion -for fk-e-ttcurin9} u/^J Bellied on A/ov-c^ibtr l7t U)l(,, Afifi-t.ila.nt culio flted CruA>J e^t^enstotfS of t)/n€ for Petition for Discretionary AevlcuSj flrit on* wa,s r^ranTtd l~eCcnd b-enl-ed* Th-t Perl ti Oh \asu. s ex-ten d-cJ ro A4a.rch •lOj 1017, Mlnuh/I) FoP kEV\E\A/ \Mheh two d-tfculled outers StouteM^ntL w-er-e ^rroneou&lV cc/nlttel a.nd ccr^Ued ccS Jh0H/!n9 the connPla-', nan A credibility

-i- IS If PlToPtr to find harmless error based Sold/ am thcct CO mPlcLlhc^n fs TtSt Imah V f

Th-e rouCi of APPea^lS dltlsloh Conflicts with cn>\ot-htr Court of cuPPza-ls oh th € Sa-fvi-c iLsue, S Peelf Ieasily. Sec SJl^LtL.

V. <tr,t +s fl±7 jC.hs. SO* 6>7o.(e9C> Ctckr, Cri*, APP. M07), The emPhu,siS of har/n ounOLltbib ''Should not he oh the ProPrletY of th-e outcome, of the trial*]. (Interna,! auota.tlon<: omitted)* The court of APPeulS huui ^xii Cov\ Ctr U-ed, J £tectue/ Pule , (L^SUla-tlohj or ordlnccnc-e-j Specifically %ule HH.XCb), Tex* id, APP>.

CWeSt MID •

AftbUMEA/r Aa/d Authorities

The court of APPea.lS uPhdd the trice! Court's Decision to oudon\t orekdud-e. the h-earsay Testimonies RulirtS if it wra,J v/ithln the i^oh-e of r ecus onu, lale dlsccJr ee.ment, si I P op, ff,b. the tourt theh he-Id thu,i ''Even If the court were to aSSUMe thaT officer Self's out-cfY testimony wa.S err oh eo USlY oudsnittedj if wa,S har/nUSb Ih 115-ht of th-e 3rccPh',Cj detcelled testimony Provided k>VS.m.L, SllP °P. PP. %j in its Mat/SiS, The count ef APPtals did not evaluate hdiv The evidence i*ra,s used, "Lnd Instecc-d St/nPlY noted there \mcuS m it wu,S Wour/nlas In l\&ht of the SrcLphic, detailed •k&sH/nohi Provided bY 6./ri.L. Slif *Y tt.t* Thi5 ^na^iisis misoLpflltS th-t Standard of harm review because. It did not o-ddr-eSi the /v\a.)h -iPP-ect o-P the. -error i.e. enkrtn Ce*^en t o-f eo/nria'.nan fs credlbilltY In the fttY tcsfi/nohY descrlb in3 th-e off-enj-e, ThlS caJe \c )/*. Portocn f beCaufe the sto^ndo^rd of r^vltna^ for httr/n under Rule W.ACb), Tex. L APP. tree CuireSt U/S)^ Is often aaIsol. PPllzd* An error rv\c\i be con si dered har/nleSS l-fj'after e.ka.jn.1 n,'n3 th-e record nuS, u~ whole, th-e. E revlewl n3 CaurtJ hctS a, ,fa-]r oussurcenct thcuf error did r\dt Influence the jury, or hcuJ. au s!l3ht effect*. TohhSon v. state, Hb7 a\w. ^d HI0jUi7 tux. cr\*\. APP. \°m). ^Cr*) h ca,Se of zriLVe doubt ouS to hour mltss h*s% th-e. Petitioner must win* /Ra.rJhcn*r v. s-hat-e . JUd S.w. 3d <?/, <?*-<?4 (Ttx. crlM. APP.XffllU -A- While the existence of other -evidence suPPortine Judgment onust a./ways be of oun V harmless error ccucciyslSj ofhgr evidence of Suilt Should not b-e the . , * sole criteria- for •Evaluating harm _ _. "tee kotteakol t/„ united <+*++<> 3£f U.S. 7S~0j 76 r, let, SCt. II 31 j [%mj 10 L.Ed, IST7 (H V(,) CConSt- rulnS federal rule that was Source tor Rule W,JI C/>J). It hca been ov-er ten Steers 6lhC-c this court has a^ddr*SSe:d th~e Inter Play between other evidence ofSiAltt o,nd PoSslbififY of harm from the -errors effect under flute Ht, 1 Cb),.(T€X. PL,APZ> PlroC. Cwest XGI1). See **/>+;!!/>. \/. <ta.tr } 7? S.W. sdl^JL^^ £T<Y, Crlm. AP?, 3-062-)1 r-ev-ersi nd court of APPectIS -for not c^nS,ide^/h^j the Weight of other evidence but also reccffltMlnS tka,f the review " fra.hSC.en dS deter mind whether the conviction was correct" itt reaffirm In3 1 _ _ the concern Is s-ou/y to trace: the Im Pact of the error ") Tn the /mean time, Imwer review In3 courts ha,i/e deve loped ol ten deincy to rely on th)S as th-e. Primary, It not tine $oler criterion, ThiS aJ.1 too often \eu^/S to OsPPIlCatloPl of Sufficiency review tath-tr than nneanlnSfui bLnrahslS of harm The ImProPerli a,dm!tTeJ- evidence., thlJ caf-e Provides can exrtsnPU through which this court s^a.y cfcurlfy th-e hi cot u re - of the re<j ulred a.n aliSiS .

PRAfER FoR kfLiFR WHEREFORE, for all of the reasohs cited a^boVe, APPetl aeit Prays that thlb court &r<inf thlb Petition remand this caS-e bacK to the court of A-PPecels with Instructions to r-ev-erse the Judgment of th-e trial court an\d remand -Tor so nen/trlccl in keeping with iti flndlhS herelh an/j in the adternatlvej enter such other orders u.s snay be c^PPro Pria-te with It-s decision h-e.rclr). resPtctfutiy submitted, TesuS fellf-t Lofe7- tDCJwo. I9S~/IW AAiCha el un i f XLleLl PM SL0 4-H tenness ~ee olcn y„ t>r 7S~^-6 PkG-SE -3- CBSTlFICAtE DFKEkVire

T., certify that ou triAe <and correct copy offklS PcHttan -for DtScra.tioneL.ry Hevlev^ was Sa.rwed to th* state's AttormV by PlacinS SCLme In th-e AniLha-el Uhiit m.a.llbo)c/ PoStcL.Se PP-t^Paidj on wiArrh I *f ia/7 whd c^ddress^d tol Christina A/efSoft / SOlai c. MOSS, AS St 01Strict Attorney of tfroit/h countyj &oo scuth t roadway, trowhusa0<i,Tx'7L>kO\

(bBclARAtio/v /vEfilFlcATln/v X, TESUS, P£JIPE LoPEz., tOWwo. itrllMj helnj Present!/ th Care -e. routtr d In t-h^e svr.w. sv\ickct-^l unit of th-e TeKOsS DePa-rtment of criminal TitSflCe. In A/tsOERSd/V cowtitY, TeiraS Verity and declare under Penal of PerJury thaf the foreSo'ittQ Siuuh&sneZtAt a.re. true, u-t^d correct* EkECiAtEO da/ THIS TUB -Ut—bAV of AAQLrch 3.017.

ft) ^si^si-frt^^ ZreStiJ F> Lo^eZ. tDCJ A/0. i9<T/ffr/ m iChael u./i,'f.

SdtbH Fax toff Ten n~eSSe*ez. colon/', P*" 7?tt£

~H~