Rodrigo Cornejo v. State
Rodrigo Cornejo v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Cause numbers: 01-17-00076-CR & 01-17-00077-CR Style: Rodrigo Cornejo v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: October 12, 2017 Type of motion: Third Overall Motion for Extension, and Second Due to Harvey Party filing motion: Appellant Rodrigo Cornejo’s counsel P.F. McCann Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief Is appeal accelerated? No. If motion to extend time: Original due date: June 12, 2017 Number of extensions granted: 3 Current Due Date: September 25, 2017 Date Requested: October 20, 2017 (130 days from original due date) Ordered that motion is: Granted If document is to be filed, document due: October 20, 2017. No further extensions of time will be granted. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Because appellant’s counsel’s third extension request overall, and second due to Hurricane Harvey, claims that he needs more time because, among other things, he was only able to return to his office in mid-September due to Harvey, the Court grants the motion, but counsel is warned that no further extensions are to be granted. See Extension of Emergency Order Authorizing Modification and Suspension of Court Procedures in Proceedings Affected by Disaster, Misc. Docket No. 17-9125 (Tex. Sept.
26, 2017); TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 38.6(d). Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not filed by October 20, 2017, the Court may abate this case. See id. 38.8(b)(2).
Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley Date: October 17, 2017
November 7, 2008 Revision
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.