Court of Appeals of Texas, 2017

Freddie Ray Mulkey v. State

Freddie Ray Mulkey v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided November 14, 2017
Freddie Ray Mulkey v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 14, 2017

NO. 03-17-00680-CR Freddie Ray Mulkey, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 14, 2017

NO. 03-17-00681-CR Freddie Ray Mulkey, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 14, 2017

NO. 03-17-00682-CR Freddie Ray Mulkey, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.