Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2017

Freddie Ray Mulkey v. State

Freddie Ray Mulkey v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 14, 2017

Freddie Ray Mulkey v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 14, 2017

NO. 03-17-00680-CR

Freddie Ray Mulkey, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 14, 2017

NO. 03-17-00681-CR

Freddie Ray Mulkey, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 14, 2017

NO. 03-17-00682-CR

Freddie Ray Mulkey, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.